AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Ashley Barbier

ANTHM02 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can; online works if and push through quiz frustration.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed online experienceCaring and knowledgeableExtra credit availableConfusing quizzes onlineAmazing in-person lectures
  • In-person students praise her passion, clarity, and support while and confusing.
  • Grades skew high when students finish, but some online work (InQuizitive, discussions) feels vague or poorly aligned.
  • , yet quality ratings range from 1 to 5.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Multiple students earned A or A+, but one incomplete and if work feels unclear.

In-person reviews report easy As; online reviews mix A grades with confusion and one Incomplete.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, yet online reading and quiz design push difficulty up for some students.

; online difficulty spans moderate to very hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others say no, with little detail on how strictly it is enforced.

Online and required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and praise passion, but polar online quality keeps this from a must-take.

Stronger recommendation language appears in .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and , but one student reports tough, rubric-inconsistent grading online.

Format shift

; one harsh online review pulls leniency down.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reading-heavy tags and is pretty easy.

Format shift

Online comments stress quizzes and reading; in-person comments stress low difficulty.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Passionate lectures and materials for some.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger and more consistent than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Quizzes, discussions, projects, and participation appear .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize ongoing .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe an , and high grades.

Main concern

Few in-person reviews, so the glowing tone may not cover every semester.

What students said

“Pretty easy”
ANTHM02
“Prof. Barbier is amazing. Her class was my first back in college after a 7 year break and I couldn't have chosen a better class.”
ANTHM02

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ANTHM02 is mixed: some call her casual, caring, and engaging while , and .

Main concern

InQuizitive-style quizzes and study guides can feel mismatched or vague, and .

What students said

“ and time consuming. Questions feel like a trick, vague or even don't match textbook.”
ANTHM02
“ , and understanding professor. Her class was engaging and neither too difficult nor too easy.”
ANTHM02
“ and the discussions are pointless”
ANTHM02

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize quizzes and ongoing work more than a .

QuizzesDiscussionsExtra creditStudy guides

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online comments focus on InQuizitive-style quizzes, study guides, and .

InQuizitive quizzesStudy guidesDiscussion posts
“ and time consuming. Questions feel like a trick, vague or even don't match textbook.”
ANTHM02
“ the rubric and only grades what she thinks is necessary.”
ANTHM02

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in person), . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is extremely knowledgeable in the field of anthropology and a delight to learn from.”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“ .”

📚

40/100

“ and struggling to find right answers than actually studying and memorizing material.”

⭐

75/100

“Pretty easy”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and understanding professor
  • She is extremely knowledgeable in the field of anthropology
  • Her class was engaging and neither too difficult nor too easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty easy
  • and time consuming
  • and the discussions are pointless

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • a delight to learn from

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across 2022-2026 with mixed tones and but not high-confidence picture.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHM025 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1