AI Rate Professor

Speech

August Bonassi

MO1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Treat reviews as unreliable overall; confirm current policies before enrolling because the two experiences clash.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict drop policyPolarizing by formatClear expectationsMandatory attendanceSpeech instructor
  • Only two reviews exist and they completely disagree by format.
  • Online review warns of and poor attitude.
  • , and highly recommended.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Both reported grades were A, but and track.

Online review stresses drop risk; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings land high and policies feel strict even when content is not described as advanced.

Both formats report elevated difficulty; online felt harsher due to policy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Both reviews indicate mandatory attendance or strict participation consequences.

; in-person notes some mandatory lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student would take him again enthusiastically; the .

In-person review is glowing; online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Clear criteria and appear in person, but .

Format shift

Online evidence is harsher than the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews ; the and participation.

Format shift

Sparse detail in both formats.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Split between amazing lectures and an uncaring online experience leaves quality mixed.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions of assignments, participation, lectures, and without a .

Format shift

Limited detail in both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One older in-person review praises clear expectations, concern for progress, and strong lectures.

Main concern

and the style is strict.

What students said

“A+ professor. on tract.”
MO1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One recent online review describes paycheck-first attitude and .

Main concern

and poor student care.

What students said

“ .”
MO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Participation mattersClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and some mandatory lectures are noted.

Clear grading criteriaSome mandatory lecturesExtra credit
“Very clear in his expectations + makes sure everyone stays on tract. Strict/funny. . Opportunities for .”
MO1

Online

; risk centers on assignment-drop policy.

Strict missed-assignment dropsParticipation matters
“ .”
MO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Professor Bonassi seems more interested in his paycheck than his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person) with directly opposing tones. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Split Verdict

50/100

“A+ professor. on tract.”

🚫 Online Policy Shock

20/100

“ .”

🎯 Clarity When It Works

70/100

“Useful and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Strict/funny
  • attitude was awful, he didn't seem to care

Theme 2

📜 About Policies

  • Opportunities for

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews years apart cannot support a stable overall profile.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MO12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values