AI Rate Professor

Art History

Alison Holmes

ARTH71197 · M100 · ARTHM1000 · ARTM100 · ARTHM100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Strong pick for art history if you will keep up with reading and writing; expect but fair paths to an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent feedbackOrganized and structuredResubmit-friendlyLots of readingEasy A with effort
  • Students , and real support for learning.
  • Workload is reading and writing heavy, not concept-brutal.
  • Most who stay on top of work report A or A+ outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A and A+ grades dominate when students complete work, use resubmits, and .

Online and ; one in-person review felt grading was too picky.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is introductory art history; the challenge is volume of reading and writing, not abstract difficulty.

Online students often call it pretty easy; one in-person student found it their hardest class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others do not require it.

Online and in-person both mix mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About five of and most reviews are strongly positive.

Online reviews are consistently positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and offset occasional tough-grader comments.

Format shift

Online leans fair and supportive; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of reading, writing, weekly assignments, and but manageable load.

Format shift

; online homework volume is especially common.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and clear expectations.

Format shift

Strong in both formats with only isolated complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Weekly assignments, quizzes, papers, and .

Format shift

Online and and quizzes over pure exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person and , and mostly manageable difficulty with one tough-grader outlier.

Main concern

and depth expectations too harsh for the time spent.

What students said

“ and helpful and will let you fix your mistakes on your assignments within the week to get a better score.”
ARTHM100
“Was literally my hardest class this fall.”
M100
“Easy A if you do this! Don't procrastinate on the !”
ARTHM100

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are organized with , and .

Main concern

Volume of textbook reading and writing can feel high.

What students said

“ and structured. Her lectures are informative and interesting.”
ARTHM100
“LOTS of , as well as lots of writing.”
ARTM100
“Just stay on top of the homework and study the chapters and everyone who takes this course will do great.”
ARTHM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment and quiz driven with resubmits and rather than strict proctored finals.

Weekly quizzesResubmit assignmentsExtra creditArt analysis papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and projects without strict proctoring claims.

Weekly assignment and quizResubmit allowedExtra creditMuseum paper or photo project
“You basically have 1 main assignment due in the middle of the week and a quiz.”
ARTHM100
“she offered which saved me! and allows you to resubmit it.”
ARTHM100

Online

, and feedback; no webcam or Lockdown Browser is mentioned.

Lots of homeworkChapter studyPrompt feedback
“Honestly the class was pretty easy, but there was a lot of homework.”
ARTHM100
“ . and very helpful.”
ARTHM1000

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She WANTS you to learn something. It's a required class - but she makes it fun and interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (7 online, 5 in , and grade outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

⭐ Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and structured. Her lectures are informative and interesting.”

📝

82/100

“ and allows you to resubmit it. Easy A if you do this!”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“LOTS of , as well as lots of writing.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes learning fun
  • Enthusiastic about the subject
  • Her style of teaching is very thorough.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you do this
  • pretty easy, but there was a lot of homework
  • if you do what you're told, you should get an A.

Theme 3

✍️

  • Gives good constructive criticism
  • , and thorough

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve recent reviews with rich detail and consistent praise across online and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARTHM1006 reviews
ARTM1003 reviews
ARTH711971 review
ARTHM10001 review
M1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1