AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Khosrow Rad

ENGRM10 · M10 · ENGTM02 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and textbooks and only need a passing grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUseless lecturesSelf-teach requiredPoor EnglishTest heavyHarsh curve risk
  • Students say lectures and
  • Assessments are few high-stakes
  • , but most urge avoiding him if you want real learning

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Curves and sparse grading items help many pass with B or A, but .

; online also stresses an under-scaffolded project.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

MATLAB and engineering content become hard mainly because instruction is weak and .

In-person and online both require .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

though students say lectures add little value.

Online and as required when stated.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Take-again rate is low and .

The sole online review and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and final grades so students pass, but some report odd or and sparse graded items.

Format shift

; the online review focuses more on unfair test coverage.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and a project; volume is moderate but mismatch makes it feel heavier.

Format shift

Similar sparse graded structure in both formats.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students call lectures useless, English , and .

Format shift

Online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades rest on few weekly assignments and 2-3 exams plus a .

Format shift

; online adds a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe , and a need to self-learn MATLAB.

Main concern

Lectures do not match labs or exams and .

What students said

“you are cooked if ... ur honestly better off learning matlab from youtube! RUN!!!”
ENGRM10
“You basically have to teach yourself everything.”
ENGRM10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review calls lectures useless, tests partially uncovered, and the .

Main concern

Not enough time or instruction for the end project and half of .

What students said

“His lectures are pretty much useless because of his poor English, and about half of the .”
ENGRM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

lectures, and students urge working fast under time pressure.

Test heavyExams mismatch labsTimed pressureCurve dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a need to work fast.

Test heavyExams unlike labsBook-based questions
“ !!!!”
ENGRM10
“work ”
ENGRM10

Online

Online review says about half of test material is not covered and the .

Uncovered test materialRushed final project
“about half of the . He does not give nearly enough time for the ”
ENGRM10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ur honestly better off learning matlab from youtube! RUN!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews focused on ENGR/MATLAB sections, emphasizing self-teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Genuinely awful... I think I self taught myself all of Matlab because his lectures were so bad.”

🧪

20/100

“You basically have to teach yourself everything.”

📉 Recommendation

22/100

“Avoid if you care about your future”

📝 Test Pressure

32/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are useless
  • Speaks broken English
  • complete apathy towards actually teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class scores
  • He doesn't fail anyone but
  • You'll probably pass, but if you

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • textbook redirects you to a website seized by the fbi
  • written directions were filled with bad grammar
  • go to Oxnard or Ventura if you must

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly recent reviews are consistent on poor teaching and self-study, but sample size is modest and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGRM106 reviews
ENGTM022 reviews
M101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values