AI Rate Professor

English

Matthew Cassaro

LSM02 · MO2 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

older students loved his writing help, but recent reviews warn of rudeness, political digressions, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing personalityPolitics in classTough graderRude moments reportedHelpful for some writers
  • Recent in-person reviews are harshly negative about tone, politics, and
  • Older reviews describe him as caring, funny, and effective at improving writing
  • and and reading

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earn As, but and when content difficulty is moderate.

In-person reviews dominate and often cite tough or ; the one online review reported an A-plus with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content itself is not always hard, but , and perspective-based writing make the course feel demanding for many.

Evidence is almost entirely in-person English composition style work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory, with lateness punishments noted in recent reviews.

In-person reviews describe strict lateness handling; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

, while recent students urge avoidance due to tone and fairness issues.

; older in-person and the one online review lean Worth It.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Multiple students call him a and demands a different perspective without enough explanation.

Format shift

and unfair grading complaints are concentrated in recent in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention lots of papers outside class, reading, and the class.

Format shift

Both the online review and in-person comments mention heavy writing load.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

and writing growth, others felt untaught, uncomfortable, and poorly treated.

Format shift

; older in-person and one online review are much more positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays, in-class work, participation, and writing practice rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Reviews across formats emphasize papers and writing work; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

recent reviews call the class pure torture with politics and rudeness, while earlier reviews praise writing growth and approachability.

Main concern

Recent students report , and harsh interpersonal treatment.

What students said

“ . This class is pure torture.”
LSM02
“I was never a good writer and I came out of the class with better and much more fluid writing.”
LSM02
“He was incredibly rude to a few students and seemed to be having some personal issues which he took out on the students.”
LSM02

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive, calling him helpful and .

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online experience is weakly supported.

What students said

“Matthew is a great teacher. Although I have him online, he always helps you if you have a question or anything.”
MO2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; evaluation is mainly writing assignments and participation.

Writing FocusedParticipation MattersLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation rather than proctored exams; exam policy is not clearly documented.

Lots of PapersParticipation Matters
“He made you write a lot of papers outside of class.”
LSM02
“His class requires you to think outside of the box to push yourself to become a better writer.”
LSM02

Online

The single online and help with questions.

Lots of Homework
“One bad side is that there is a lot of homework.”
MO2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . This class is pure torture.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews with a strong time-based split between older praise and recent complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Recent Student Frustration

25/100

“ . This class is pure torture.”

✍️ Writing Growth for Some

80/100

“I was never a good writer and I came out of the class with better and much more fluid writing.”

⚖️

32/100

“He grades unfairly. He doesn't explain certain details that .”

👍 Older Recommendation Wave

85/100

“I really think he was an awesome professor. And that he was the coolest professor I ever taken.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He keeps talking about political things that are irrelevant to the class.
  • He is great and .
  • assure that he/she knows and understands the required material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He grades unfairly.
  • There is a lot of homework.
  • He made you write a lot of papers outside of class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He was incredibly rude to a few students.
  • He is a very nice professor and he allows the students to work together.
  • Matt is an elitist ass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews show a , so credibility is moderate despite enough detail to see the pattern.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

LSM0213 reviews
MO21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5