AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Dawson Matthews

CSE16 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

If CSE16 with ; students call him one of the .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirationalHilarious lecturesDeeply caringCrystal-clear teachingLow-stress high-learning
  • Both students rate him a perfect 5 and .
  • Lectures are clear, funny, and heavy stress.
  • He goes out of his way to help individuals understand the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Both students earned A or A+ and describe assignments as easy to understand while still educational.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate-low and students say , though still teaches real content.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and another says no, so policy is unclear overall.

reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and one doubts they will ever have a better professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Top grades and stress-free assignment framing suggest fair, student-friendly evaluation.

Format shift

Based only on two in-person CSE16 reviews.

Workload

Light

76/100

Assignments are described as easy to comprehend and low-stress while still teaching the subject.

Format shift

Workload comments are in-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

, and inspirational, with exceptional individual help.

Format shift

Teaching praise .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Reviews emphasize understandable assignments more than exams, with .

Format shift

and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Both in-person CSE16 students describe him as caring, hilarious, and .

Main concern

Very small sample makes broader claims uncertain.

What students said

“He is wonderful- really cares about individual students and goes out of his way to make you understand.”
CSE16
“ and concise and he was always available to help if .”
CSE16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam proctoring or format and .

Assignment focusedClear instructions

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove exam style; .

Clear assignmentsLow stress workload
“ but also taught me a lot about the subject while avoiding stress!”
CSE16

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I honestly doubt I'll ever have a better professor than him in all of my future academia.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person CSE16 reviews, highlighting exceptional teaching and care. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“ and concise and he was always available to help if .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“I honestly doubt I'll ever have a better professor than him in all of my future academia.”

❤️ Student Care

95/100

“He is wonderful- really cares about individual students and goes out of his way to make you understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and concise
  • Amazing lectures
  • Hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • but also taught me a lot about the subject while avoiding stress!
  • A+

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really cares about individual students
  • if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two highly positive 2023 reviews exist, so but sample size remains very small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSE162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values