AI Rate Professor

English

Tamarra Coleman

M013B · ENGLM01A · ENGMO1A · MATHM01A · M01A · ENGM01A · ENGMO1B · ENGLM01B · ENGM01B · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
46.88%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if and are fine with race-focused prompts; otherwise pick another English professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRace-Heavy EssaysSlow GradingResubmit AllowedMany PapersPolarizing
  • Grades and teaching quality are highly polarized across years and formats.
  • Course centers on many papers and race/gender topics more than classic English skills.
  • Online students report weaker email response and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Many students report As if they follow directions and finish the papers, though a minority call her a .

Both formats report attainable As; online also has 'do minimal work and you'll pass' while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is not conceptually brutal for college English, but volume of reading and .

Online and in-person both describe writing-heavy rather than conceptually advanced material.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

, though a few in-person sections treated it as required.

Online is largely optional; a minority of .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

About half would take again; praise for care and humor and grading pace.

; online leans more negative on responsiveness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Resubmits and , but and slow returns frustrate many.

Format shift

Online more often complains about harsh or ; and resubmits.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Repeated So many papers and Lots of ; 8-week sections feel especially packed.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize multiple essays; online also piles weekly assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Fans praise humor and care; critics say she is disconnected, slow, and does not teach English craft.

Format shift

In-person has stronger rave reviews; online more often says she does not teach or respond.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grade is and quizzes more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-centered; one online review notes an .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and ; many say she is disconnected and not really teaching English.

Main concern

and content that feels more social/political than writing craft for some students.

What students said

“ because she is so funny and generous.”
ENGLM01A
“This professor was so bad, I want to give her a zero.”
M013B
“its an easy a but incredibly annoying, not a good teacher !”
ENGMO1B

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections often feel under-taught with slow emails, delayed grades, and race-centered busywork; a few still call her a safe easier English pick.

Main concern

Slow responses, tough or delayed grading, and .

What students said

“ .”
ENGLM01B
“ . Take her for M01A or M01B!”
ENGLM01A
“She REFUSES to give comments on your essays, even when you asks she just ignores.”
ENGM01B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers and quizzes; limited exam detail .

Essay-HeavyEasy Final MentionedQuizzesResubmits

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes more than described formal finals.

Multiple EssaysQuizzesResubmits
“there are at least six papers during this course and she . many quizzes.”
ENGMO1B
“ ”
ENGM01B

Online

Online comments focus on essays and busywork; one student called the .

Easy FinalEssaysQuizzes
“ . Take her for M01A or M01B!”
ENGLM01A
“Boring and hard class.”
ENGLM01A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“its an easy a but incredibly annoying, not a good teacher !”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (11 online, 21 in , and grade accessibility. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Polarized Teaching Quality

42/100

“I wish I had checked here first because this professor was way below my expectations.”

📝

30/100

“Get ready to read because she's gonna let you write a .”

🎯 Attainable Grades If You Follow Directions

72/100

“As long as you follow the directions you will be successful in her class.”

📧 Online Responsiveness Issues

40/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is so funny and generous
  • .
  • Doesn't teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • its an easy a but incredibly annoying
  • Do minimal work and you'll pass.
  • she is a , but she always there to help

Theme 3

📚 About Course Content

  • .
  • You learn more about race issues than English.
  • the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

32 detailed reviews spanning 2018-2023 with , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENGLM01A13 reviews
ENGMO1A5 reviews
M01A4 reviews
ENGM01B3 reviews
ENGMO1B3 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENGLM01B1 review
ENGM01A1 review
M013B1 review
MATHM01A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 10 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 6