AI Rate Professor

English

Daniela Guevara

ENGLM01A · ENGMO1A · ENGL1A · ENGM03 · ENGLM01 · ENG32818 · ENGM01A · ESLMO1 · ENGLMO1A · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will follow , and stay organized; otherwise look elsewhere.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing GraderEssay Revision AllowedSo Many PapersTough On FormattingDetailed Feedback (When Given)
  • Reviews split almost evenly between glowing praise and .
  • Positive , and .
  • Critics cite harsh , and heavy paper load.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Revisions and help, but work.

Online positives stress revisable essays; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college English with and .

Both formats report lots of papers; online sometimes feels easier with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and ; others say attendance is not required.

In-person more often stresses participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and growth; half urge students to avoid her.

Split is sharp in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

; minor formatting mistakes can crush essay scores.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

So many papers, daily homework or discussions, and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy paper volume; online adds discussion posts.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

, and clear; half call lectures careless and .

Format shift

Polarization appears in both formats with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and reading rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Essay focus is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

impossible grader with political content complaints.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She requires you to participate every class discussion... .”
ENGMO1A
“Insanely minor errors gets you a 0.”
ENGLM01A
“ .”
ENGLM01A

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and easy with unlimited InQuizitive tries, others report harsh grading and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She was very easy, only like 5 essays total and the rest was tested on how MLA format works so they were always 100%.”
ENGLM01A
“Professor takes way , and when you do the .”
ENGLM01
“In this class you get what you put in. If you don't .”
ENGM01A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk centers on graded papers and formatting more than proctored exams.

Essay HeavyRevisions AllowedMLA Formatting FocusQuizzes On Format

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation driven; reviews do not clearly prove lockdown or webcam exams.

Many PapersParticipation PointsEssay Revisions
“ . She offers too.”
ENGMO1A
“Insanely minor errors gets you a 0.”
ENGLM01A

Online

, and discussions; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

EssaysInQuizitiveDiscussion Posts
“only like 5 essays total and the rest was tested on how MLA format works so they were always 100% and she grades very nicely with essays if you try a bit.”
ENGLM01A
“she also allows you because she offers good feedback.”
ENGM01A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Getting an A in her class is very doable, you just have to work for it. Please utilize her office hours. It will seriously help as she .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting the . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Experience

52/100

“ ”

📝 Revision Lifeline

70/100

“she also allows you because she offers good feedback.”

🎯 Tough On Details

34/100

“Regardless of how hard I tried, all my essays were bad grades due to formatting issues.”

👍 When It Clicks

85/100

“She was the sweetest, most genuine teacher I have ever had. Young, fun, relatable, and engages with all her students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her class is extremely
  • clear and broke it down so it all made sense
  • lectures feel careless and uninterested

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she
  • Will mark you down even for small errors
  • Insanely minor errors gets you a 0

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • There will be a lot of and papers
  • lots of reading later discussed in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

26 recent mixed reviews with rich detail and a clear 12-12 quality split support a medium-low overall picture.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENGLM01A12 reviews
ENGM01A4 reviews
ENGLM012 reviews
ENGLMO1A2 reviews
ENGMO1A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG328181 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGM031 review
ESLMO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 6 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1