AI Rate Professor

Hospitality

Stefan Cosentino

HOSPM200 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Skip if you want real hospitality learning; .

Best fit · Easy A HunterReads PowerPointsDry MaterialEasy QuizzesGraded by Few ThingsLow Effort Course
  • .
  • Class and quizzes are easy because content is underdeveloped.
  • You can earn an A with minimal study, but you learn little.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Student earned an A with easy quizzes and few graded items requiring little real effort.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

78/100

Material was dry and not challenging, so intellectual demand stayed low.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Student said it was not a good class due to weak teaching and irrelevant material.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

84/100

Graded by few things with .

Format shift

Based on the single Online review.

Workload

Light

80/100

Little teaching effort translated into light quizzes and minimal student work.

Format shift

Based on the single Online review.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Professor mainly read PowerPoints and failed to make dry material relevant.

Format shift

Based on the single Online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centered on easy quizzes and few graded .

Format shift

Based on the single Online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online section felt dry and underdeveloped, with slide-reading lectures and easy quizzes.

Main concern

Weak teaching quality and little challenge despite the easy grade.

What students said

“Lectures were basically Prof. . Easy class and quizzes since there was little effort put into teaching material”
HOSPM200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment was light quizzes and sparse graded items with .

Easy QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online quizzes were easy and .

Easy QuizzesFew Graded Items
“Easy class and teaching material and challenging students to learn it.”
HOSPM200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unfortunately wasn't a good class. Material was dry and, in my opinion, poorly developed, taught, and made relevant and interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 Online review, highlighting weak teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Lectures were basically Prof. .”

🎯 Easy Grade Path

86/100

“Easy class and teaching material and challenging students to learn it.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

22/100

“Unfortunately wasn't a good class. Material was dry and, in my opinion, poorly developed, taught, and made relevant and interesting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were basically Prof. .
  • Material was dry and, in my opinion, poorly developed, taught, and made relevant and interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class and teaching material
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2022 Online review with moderate detail, so confidence in patterns is limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HOSPM2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values