AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Erika Lizee

ARTMAPREL · ARTM43 · ARTM44PAINT2 · ARTM110 · 2DDESIGN · ART2D · ARTM30 · ARTM01 · ARTM20 · ARTM44 · ARTM23 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you care about improving as an artist and and supply costs.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational ArtistExcellent FeedbackHeavy Project LoadFair But DemandingMust-Take Studio
  • Students overwhelmingly call her one of the and passion.
  • Workload and supplies are heavy, so it is not a free elective A.
  • She is fair and supportive if you put in real effort and attend.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

if requirements are met, but and this is not a free A.

One Online watercolor review calls it an easy A; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet project difficulty rises for majors and weak drawers.

Online watercolor felt lighter; in-person painting and design courses feel more demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple comments say participation and absences.

; Online lists attendance not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Vast majority call her best-ever art teacher and .

; a few Access-student complaints are the main dissent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

She is chill if and rewards honest effort over raw talent.

Format shift

Online and ; she still expects full requirements.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of weekly projects, critiques, and expensive supplies create a heavy studio load.

Format shift

Online and ; advanced courses may lighten slightly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly praise clear demos, honest critiques, passion, and personal mentoring.

Format shift

Strong praise across Online and In person, with only rare access-support complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio students praise her talent, honesty, and growth-focused critiques, with heavy but rewarding work.

Main concern

Large workload, pricey supplies, and .

What students said

“Erika is the . , and thoughtful.”
ARTM43
“ and learn a lot. ”
ARTM44
“ because you think it will be an easy grade- you'll be very disappointed!”
ARTM43

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online watercolor students love her feedback and call it an easy A, while .

Main concern

art credit.

What students said

“One of . I took her watercoloring class for fun and she taught me so much!”
ARTM43
“the amount of .”
ARTM44

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is studio projects and critiques with .

Project CritiquesWeekly TechniquesParticipation MattersNo Formal Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation with no formal exam policy described.

CritiquesProject RequirementsParticipation Matters
“ as long as you do all the requirements to the assignment.”
ARTM43
“Class participation and .”
ARTM43

Online

Online work is weekly technique practice and and options.

Weekly TechniquesProject FeedbackExtra Credit
“You have to work on "quick" different water coloring techniques each week!”
ARTM43
“she's nice and . But if you have a very busy schedule and simply just need an art credit, this isn't the class for you.”
ARTM44

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . super supportive, VERY inspirational. young, funny, cute, smart. excellent lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (2 Online, 25 In person), highlighting inspirational teaching and heavy studio work. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Erika is the . , and thoughtful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ and learn a lot. Must take her class, you will become a better artist and have fun.”

📦 Workload Reality

34/100

“This class is absolutely amazing but a large workload!”

⚖️

56/100

“ because you think it will be an easy grade- you'll be very disappointed!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so down and show you how to do something.
  • she's so passionate about what she does and that is reflected in the way she teaches.
  • excellent lectures. just the right amount of lectures, critiques and lab time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's an easy A!
  • the amount of .
  • Follow the instructions to a tee and you'll do fine.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Erika is super sweet!
  • .
  • I love Erika, she is the nicest painting teacher I've ever had.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews over many years with consistent praise for teaching and workload give high confidence.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARTM439 reviews
ARTM207 reviews
ARTM012 reviews
ARTM442 reviews
2DDESIGN1 review
Show 6 more courses
ART2D1 review
ARTM1101 review
ARTM231 review
ARTM301 review
ARTM44PAINT21 review
ARTMAPREL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1