AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Timothy Lumas

CJM03CJM14 · CJM02 · CJMO1 · CJM01 · CJM03 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
47.37%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you need an and can tolerate mandatory, story-heavy classes with uneven professionalism.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarized ReputationMandatory Attendance Door LockExtra Credit HeavyStory Over SyllabusEasy A Low Learning
  • Grades are often easy with book-based tests and , yet many say they learned little.
  • and he locks the door minutes after class starts.
  • early fans call him hilarious and career-inspiring; later students call him unprofessional and disorganized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many report As or A+s with , and comments that you have to try hard to fail.

Nearly ; the single online review also describes the class as a cakewalk once criteria clicked.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Low average difficulty and frequent notes of light lectures, movies, and .

In-person comments dominate; online difficulty was moderate but still passable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and he locks the door a few minutes into class.

Mandatory door-lock policy is described almost entirely in in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

career-focused fans love the stories, while if another instructor exists.

; the one online review was positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

High reported A rates, , and book-based tests balance occasional tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

In-person grades skew high; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Core load is a few tests and a 15-hour community service project with light day-to-day lectures.

Format shift

Community service headache appears in in-person CJM03; online mentioned less project pain.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Charismatic LE stories and humor clash with later claims of unprofessional, off-topic, and .

Format shift

Polarization is almost entirely in-person; the online review was more positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment centers on a , and a required community service project.

Format shift

most often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person sections mix mandatory , and lots of storytelling; fans praise humor and LE insight while critics say lectures skip the book and professionalism slips.

Main concern

and uneven structure leave many feeling they paid for little real learning.

What students said

“AVOID IF YOU CAN!”
CJM03
“If interested in an easy class where you learn nothing and will most likely get an A then this is the class for you.”
CJM03
“ tests are only on one chapter”
CJM03

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but passed after adopting a community-policing mindset, with good feedback and .

Main concern

to his style.

What students said

“At and the criteria he uses. But once I got the hang of how community policing works it was a cakewalk.”
CJM03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely described as straight from the textbook with advance page references, so content risk is low if you read.

Book-based testsPage numbers givenChapter testsFew graded items

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes pre-cued with page numbers.

Book-based testsPage numbers before testsChapter tests
“He also gives questions to tests (page numbers in .”
CJM03
“ tests are only on one chapter”
CJM03

Online

The single online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If interested in an easy class where you learn nothing and will most likely get an A then this is the class for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (1 online, 25 in person), highlighting polarization on learning vs grades. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Have never met such an unprofessional and .”

📈 Easy Grades

82/100

“You have to try hard to fail his class.”

🚪

18/100

“ and he locks the door about 3 minutes into class.”

👍 Recommendation Split

47/100

“If there was another teacher for M03 I would have much rather taken that.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most class periods are spent bickering about random events
  • Many classes were spent watching movies on Netflix
  • Lumas teaches bigger picture life skills

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • do all the and an A is easy to achieve
  • Doesn't have a
  • 3 Tests, first two you probably wont pass but the last one is both together

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • very unprofessional and is a liar to his students
  • He is a liar and I WASTED my time
  • AVOID IF YOU CAN!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews spanning 2013-2021 with detailed conflicting narratives give strong sample size though tone shifts over time.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CJM0320 reviews
CJM022 reviews
303211 review
CJM011 review
CJM03CJM141 review
Show 1 more courses
CJMO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 11

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1