AI Rate Professor

Communication

Michelle Brownlee

R101 · COM101 · COMMMO1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid for nervous speakers who will participate and ; skip if you need flexible late policies.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyParticipation HeavyCaring CoachTough On DetailsConfidence BuilderNo Late Work COVID
  • Two students praise her warmth and public-speaking confidence building.
  • She grades hard on details and requires frequent in-class speaking.
  • One COVID-era review attacks no-late-work rigidity and perceived lack of expertise.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

and frequent speaking points mean a high grade takes consistent effort.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content difficulty is moderate; challenge comes more from participation and .

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others required weekly speaking participation.

Policies differ across the three in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Two of and confidence gains despite one strongly negative review.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and no late work in at least one term.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly speaking activities and speeches create steady work without reports of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Warm, encouraging, and confidence-building for many, but one student questions expertise and classroom control.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades hinge on speeches, weekly speaking activities, and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person oral communication is participation-driven with a , and mixed views on flexibility during COVID.

Main concern

Strict late-work rules and .

What students said

“Really nice and helpful teacher, but she grades kinda hard and on a lot of details.”
COM101
“You can tell she cares a lot about students. She is always encouraging and smiling, which helps the nerves of public speaking.”
COMMMO1
“Doesn't accept late work during covid because the semester is too "condensed". Lacks empathy for students”
R101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is speech and participation focused; .

Speech-based assessmentWeekly speaking activitiesParticipation points

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grading centers on frequent oral activities and .

In-class speechesWeekly speaking for points
“almost every week had an activity where everyone had to speak in front of the class for points.”
COM101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is always encouraging and smiling, which helps the nerves of public speaking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, balancing . Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“You can tell she cares a lot about students.”

⚖️

32/100

“she grades kinda hard and on a lot of details.”

🗣️ Participation Pressure

40/100

“almost every week had an activity where everyone had to speak in front of the class for points.”

👎 Flexibility Complaint

25/100

“Doesn't accept late work during covid because the semester is too "condensed".”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really nice and helpful teacher
  • helps you get confidence
  • was still a good learning experience and helped my confidence

Theme 2

📈

  • grades kinda hard and on a lot of details
  • insecure in

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • always encouraging and smiling
  • Accessible outside class
  • Lacks empathy for students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

and one sharp outlier reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COM1011 review
COMMMO11 review
R1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1