AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Pamela Jankowski

M05 · MATHM03 · M01 · M10 · MATHM01A · MATHM01 · MATH30367 · MATHMO3 · M03 · MATHM05 · MATHM10 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are strong in self-study and will do all the homework; otherwise risk confusion and uneven teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingLots of homeworkCaring but unclearTest heavyMandatory attendance
  • some call her the own notes.
  • Heavy homework, quizzes, and .
  • Online and pandemic-era classes draw more tech-support and clarity complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Even A students often self-taught; grades range from A to F and dropouts after heavy effort.

Online and ; and raves.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty about 3.5 with lots of , and .

Both formats call content hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Skip class you will not pass tags and .

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Would-take-again near 62% with passionate fans and .

Online leans more negative; in-person is deeply split by student readiness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tough grader tags, concept marks on group work, and .

Format shift

Online and ; helps some.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and test-heavy load dominate tags.

Format shift

Heavy workload is consistent online and in person.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and condescending moments.

Format shift

and ; online stress tech and clarity issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, and ; several call it test heavy.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

to do not take her; effort and homework decide outcomes.

Main concern

Unclear lectures, fast pace, and .

What students said

“THE ! She goes through her lectures step by step and very clearly.”
MATHM05
“She doesn't know , and couldn't answer simple questions”
M10
“ ... I showed up to every class, did every assignment, came to every tutoring session and still failed”
MATHM03

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

successes.

Main concern

Students used as tech support and .

What students said

“She uses her students as tech support and we often catch her .”
M10
“she just used her students for tech support during class and wouldnt get through the lecture notes.”
MATHM10
“ understand and really wants to see her students succeed.”
MATHM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent quizzes and risk factor.

Test heavyPop quizzesStudy guidesHomework-linked testsGroup work graded

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and dropped-test options in places.

Pop quizzesTest heavyStudy guidesDropped test
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATHM03
“She gives great study guides for .”
MATHM05

Online

Online reviews mention tests covering material not taught and ; .

Tests include untaught materialCengage homework
“some materials that .”
MATHM10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Jankowski should not teach math. She doesn't know , and couldn't answer simple questions asked by students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (5 online, 23 in person), highlighting polarizing clarity, heavy work, and split recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“THE ! She goes through her lectures step by step and very clearly.”

⚠️ Polarizing Clarity

30/100

“She doesn't know ”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Lots of HW but 95% of Text Book ?s given have answers in the back”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Actually teaches the class instead of .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not an easy class
  • still failed the class

Theme 3

💻 About Online Issues

  • used her students as tech support
  • struggles to use zoom
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews spanning 2016-2021 with detailed opposing camps, rich tags, and consistent workload themes.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATHM037 reviews
MATHM014 reviews
MATHM104 reviews
M013 reviews
M033 reviews
Show 6 more courses
M102 reviews
M051 review
MATH303671 review
MATHM01A1 review
MATHM051 review
MATHMO31 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3