AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Eric Pham

MATHM15 · MO30496 · MATHMO5 · STATM15 · MO5 · STATSM15 · MATHM01 · M15 · M03 · M05 · STATSM01 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if , and can handle test-focused grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringTest heavyExtra creditNew teacherClear when focused
  • Many students call him caring and and lower math.
  • Grade risk is real because .
  • and self-teach complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many A and B grades appear when students work, but and some Fs or .

Online praise for no-surprise exams contrasts with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is manageable with prior math/stat background, but lectures can feel heavy for first-timers.

Online and few hard outliers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, while others list attendance as not required.

online ones.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About two-thirds would take again, with .

Online opinions are more split; in-person majority leans positive if you put in effort.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

homework and participation help some students, but several call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention ; some in-person sections feel harsher and test-only.

Workload

Light

62/100

, with the real load sitting in lectures and exams.

Format shift

, but most describe limited assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Students repeatedly call him caring and , though newness and .

Format shift

Online reviews are more polarized than the mostly positive in-person set.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Many courses revolve around tests, with as rather than core grade weight.

Format shift

Especially clear in in-person MATHMO5 and several M05/stat sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often described as nice and helpful, but .

Main concern

Some sections are almost entirely exam-based with .

What students said

“you MUST do well on the tests. He does not give or ”
MATHMO5
“ if you are struggling. no regrets”
MATHM01
“if you apply yourself to his material the class is easy”
M05

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

he reads slides and is hard to reach.

Main concern

Some online students felt they taught themselves while he side-chatted or read PowerPoints.

What students said

“Eric Pham has been my favorite proffesor by far. He is such a wholesome guy, and not to mention an amazing teacher.”
MO5
“I spent the entire semester teaching myself the lessons as he spends his time having side conversations.”
STATSM15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some sections give practice support and , but reviews do not prove open-book or unproctored policies.

Test heavyHomework due day of exam for extra creditStudy guides or practice exams sometimesPop quizzes possible

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some include study guides or practice exams, others feel under-prepared for finals.

Test heavyPractice exams sometimesHomework as extra creditPop quizzes possible
“He does not give or , so if you don't do well on them, you will most likely fail the course.”
MATHMO5
“ ,grades generious & bonus question,test study guides,practice exams”
MATHM01

Online

Online comments say taught material appears on exams with .

No surprises on examsHomework due exam day
“What he teaches is on the .”
STATM15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the work and pay attention, you will do well. The HW is due the day of the anything you are confused about.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews across online and and test risk. Credibility rating: High.

❤️

68/100

“I love professor Pham. and very understanding. If you have trouble with math he is definitely the teacher to take.”

🧪

40/100

“you MUST do well on the tests. He does not give or ”

👍

68/100

“ and class to anyone!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • wholesome guy, and not to mention an amazing teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty easy if you put in effort and time

Theme 3

🎁 About

  • Collects hw for that goes toward the tests
  • Homework is due day of the
  • gives some when you do the homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent mixed reviews across online and teaching and test weight.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

M054 reviews
MATHM152 reviews
M031 review
M151 review
MATHM011 review
Show 6 more courses
MATHMO51 review
MO304961 review
MO51 review
STATM151 review
STATSM011 review
STATSM151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2