AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Blaine Kutin

MATHM03 · M0371076 · STATM01 · M01 · M03 · M15 · MATHM01 · MATHM15 · M25A · MATHM05 · MATHM07 · M16 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you already handle math decently and and tests; weak math students should pick someone else.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyWork Hard for ASkip Class You FailMixed Lecture ClarityNot Ideal for Weak Math
  • strong students praise fairness and structure; and awkward.
  • A is available if and , but content and pace assume solid prior math skill.
  • and ; online evidence is thin and negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Multiple students say an A is possible only with and test prep, and weak math backgrounds often struggle despite effort.

Almost ; the one online review ended in a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students repeatedly note fast pace, few examples per section, no calculator in algebra, and assumptions that everyone already knows math.

Difficulty complaints are concentrated in in-person math and stats sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags like Skip class? You won't pass appear often.

; online also listed attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

and work hard; many GE and struggling students say avoid.

Recommendation split .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and fair if you study; and grade by few high-stakes items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework, lecture-heavy days, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

Workload intensity is documented mainly in in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and care; many say monotone, awkward, or unable to convey material.

Format shift

Positive and negative teaching comments are mostly in-person; the lone online review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests, test questions from homework, and and homework.

Format shift

; online details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and rewarding of effort; others say he lectures without teaching and fails non-math people.

Main concern

and weak support for students who struggle with math.

What students said

“If you work hard in this class, you'll get an A.”
M16
“he is not a teacher; he is a lecturer. This makes it difficult for the average student taking this class for his general education requirements.”
M0371076
“Blaine Kutin is AWFUL! I'm failing!”
M16

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review describes confusion, few examples, and a math.

Main concern

Explanations and examples felt insufficient for .

What students said

“ and He didnt have a lot of examples for the sections so when it came down to the hw I didnt know how to do all the problems”
M03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; if you study, others find them harsh with little cushion.

Test heavyHomework-aligned testsNo calculator in algebraPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections are test-heavy with , and at least one report of no calculator in algebra.

Test heavyHomework-aligned testsPop quizzesNo calculator in algebra
“He takes a lot of , so as long as you do that and study you should do fine.”
M25A
“he doesnt let you use a calculator because THATS HOW ALGEBRA WORKS”
MATHM03

Online

review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you work hard in this class, you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (1 online, 15 in person), highlighting , and test-heavy structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He understands the material very well but is not good at conveying it.”

👍 Recommendation Split

46/100

“If you are considering taking this teacher, DONT!”

📚 Effort for Grade

38/100

“All he asks is that you work hard. Too many students just want to be able to google their way through a class.”

📝

30/100

“For the sake of and Study most of my class dropped or didn't study so they didn't do well in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is not a teacher; he is a lecturer
  • His lectures and examples were well presented and interesting
  • His voice is always so monotone

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you work hard in this class, you'll get an A
  • If math is not your
  • if you study

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and answers everyones questions
  • He is so awkward and bad at teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning 2015-2020 with detailed comments and consistent polarization give usable signal, though ratings are older and split by student math background.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATHM033 reviews
M162 reviews
MATHM012 reviews
M011 review
M031 review
Show 7 more courses
M03710761 review
M151 review
M25A1 review
MATHM051 review
MATHM071 review
MATHM151 review
STATM011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1