AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Esther Kim

MATHM25A · MATHM03 · MATHMO1A · MATHM16A · MATHMO3 · M03 · MATHM07 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will attend, do the homework, and ask questions; skip if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkClear if You AskTest HeavyCaring but FastAttendance Critical
  • Many students call her one of the , and partial credit.
  • , and keeping pace because lectures move fast.
  • A minority report rude group dynamics, hard finals, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Some report easy or partial-credit friendly grading, but most , and .

One online review called A bare-minimum easy; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Algebra and calc content is manageable with her methods for many students, but pace and volume are often challenging.

Online difficulty reports range low to moderate; in-person calc and summer sections feel faster and harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Skip-class tags and comments say missing one day can leave you lost because she covers a lot daily.

warnings in person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students would take her again for and support, though a .

Recommendation is stronger in person overall; online is split one positive and one no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Partial credit, dropped low quizzes, and help, but some call her a .

Format shift

; one online review found grading very easy.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and care; negatives cite speed, condescension, or poor group management.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strongest; online is mixed on personality.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Homework and daily group work matter, but and .

Format shift

; online mentions easy quizzes and tests without heavy policy detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair chances to pass with work; a few slam fast pace, group-test rules, and .

Main concern

and occasional unclear expectations or group constraints.

What students said

“The .”
M03
“I hated this class. She was rude and and expectations.”
MATHM03
“all that matters are the 3 exams and the and the group work you get every day is worth 5% only”
MATHM07

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one says bare-minimum easy A but unmemorable and condescending tone; another calls her a .

Main concern

Personality and engagement feel uneven online even when content is easy.

What students said

“ and . Her course required the bare minimum for an A.”
MATHMO1A
“This professor is a total sweetheart! She understands the subject really well. This semester is the first time I felt like I actually GOT math.”
MATHM03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard math testing with , and ; friendliness varies by section.

Quizzes and testsGroup quizzes optionalDropped low quizzesHeavy final weightLots of homework prep

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

group quizzes or tests, dropped low quizzes, and sometimes a hard final.

Test heavyGroup quizzes or testsDropped low quizzesHard final possible
“She takes off two of . Ask for group quizzes and she will allow it.”
M03
“She made the :(”
MATHM25A
“all that matters are the 3 exams and the final”
MATHM07

Online

Online comments mention , and tests without describing proctoring tools.

Easy quizzes and testsHomework based
“ and . Her course required the bare minimum for an A.”
MATHMO1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (2 online, 9 in person), highlighting clarity and care for , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“the way professor Kim teaches the subject is very interesting and easy to understand, she teaches you easy methods.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ !”

📚

28/100

“ and tests and you will pass.”

⚠️ Polarizing Experience

40/100

“I hated this class. She was rude and and expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is a total sweetheart
  • She also went through the material rather quickly
  • and teaches very fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class was very easy. gives a lot of partial credit
  • Of course one has to work for it but she gives you all you need in order to pass the class
  • if she's the last option

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Kim is really nice, she gives lots of opportunity to help you're grade
  • , and goes out of her way to help you understand
  • Unreasonable and rude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed reviews from 2018-2020 show a , but sample size and some conflict lower confidence.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATHM034 reviews
M032 reviews
MATHM071 review
MATHM16A1 review
MATHM25A1 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHMO1A1 review
MATHMO31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values