AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Lannie Reyes

CSM01 · M01 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Possible if you need intro CS and can self-study around disorganization, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized lecturesParticipation heavyPop quizzesCreative projectsExpects prior knowledge
  • Students agree she is nice but repeatedly call the and off-topic.
  • Intro CS can feel slow or assume prior knowledge, with participation and pop quizzes mattering.
  • Assignments and exams are doable if you read the book and use PowerPoints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Reported grades include A, A-, and , and do projects, but organization issues add friction.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

55/100

Intro CS content is manageable for some, yet others say it felt slow or assumed prior programming knowledge.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags include participation matters and skip class you will not pass.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

supporters like creativity and kindness; critics cite chaos and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; success tracks reading, notes, and project completion.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Projects, reading, PowerPoints, participation, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Described as intelligent and sweet but , and for beginners.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of creative projects, participation, pop quizzes, and exams based on reading and lecture notes.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Small sample of in-person intro CS describes a sweet instructor with creative projects but weak structure and .

Main concern

Disorganization and assuming students already know material.

What students said

“She messes up sometimes but as long as you read the book, you understand what she is trying to say.”
CSM01
“ and doesn't stay on topic.”
CSM01
“Professor Reyes is very disorganized with the way she, teachers, her class.”
M01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as straightforward if you read and as a hazard.

Reading-based examsPowerPoint studyPop quizzesTest heavy tags

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes; pop quizzes and participation also count.

Snap exams with readingPop quizzesParticipation
“ as long as you did the reading and took notes during lecture.”
CSM01
“Read the book and study her powerpoints and you will do good in her class.”
CSM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She wasn't very organized with how she structured her class but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She is very intelligent, but and doesn't stay on topic.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Its hard to make a justified rating on a professor's first class but she was a joy to learn from.”

📚 Workload & Exams

55/100

“ as long as you did the reading and took notes during lecture.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really sweet and nice!
  • she expected us to already know the material.
  • this class felt very slow to get intoprogram

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Read the book and study her powerpoints and you will do good in her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with mixed opinions and limited time span, so scores should be treated cautiously.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CSM013 reviews
M011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1