AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alberto Beron

MATH · PREALGEBRA · MATH01 · MATH3 · MATHM03 · MATHMO1 · MTHM03 · MATHMO5 · M · MATHINT · MATH05 · MATHM01 · COLLEGEALGEBRA · MATHMO3 · M03 · MATHM05 · MATH5 · MATH03 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Only take him if you can self-teach math well; most students say run and find another instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTeach yourselfTough graderOff-topic storiesMistakes on board
  • Most students say you must teach yourself because lectures are incomplete and error-prone.
  • Tests are hard and picky while homework is often optional but essential to pass.
  • A minority of older reviews praise him, but the dominant modern pattern is strong avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some A grades exist, but many report , and teaching yourself just to pass.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and constant self-study needs make the course intellectually and practically hard.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance is often not taken or not mandatory, yet quizzes are used to force presence for some terms.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is 0% and the majority of detailed comments urge students not to take him.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and picky partial-credit cuts are common even when homework is light.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework is often optional but essential; quizzes and tests carry most of the grade.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Dominant theme is incomplete explanations, board mistakes, and off-topic tangents.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Many reviews say only quizzes and tests count, with homework optional or unchecked.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

incomplete board , and self-teaching required, with a smaller older minority of positive reviews.

Main concern

You may learn little in lecture and and tests.

What students said

“He was so confusing and so rude to his students... most people dropped or stopped showing up.”
MATHM03
“ !!! I teach myself everything. He does not know what he is talking about.”
M03
“Can't even do his own problems without getting them wrong. .”
MATHM05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and self-made tests are hard, timed, and graded for every detail with little teaching support.

Test heavyTough graderTimed testsPicky detail gradingQuizzes often

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests are often described as , and much harder than lectures.

Test heavyTough graderTimed testsPicky detail grading
“on quizzes test you must write every detail or he takes points off for the smallest thing.”
PREALGEBRA
“the tests and .”
M03
“Lots of homework, Test heavy, Tough grader”
MATHM03

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“NICE GUY...BAD TEACHER...had to teach myself most of the material and go to math lab for ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews spanning many years, weighted toward repeated self-teaching and tough-test themes. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Don't take him unless you plan on teaching yourself.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“Worst teacher i've ever had in my entire life.”

🧪 Exam Strictness

30/100

“on quizzes test you must write every detail or he takes points off for the smallest thing.”

📚 Self-Teaching Required

25/100

“I teach myself everything. He does not know what he is talking about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He constantly messes up on examples and does NOT finish all the problems
  • constiently makes error when solving questions on board
  • goes off top and doesn't really know exactly how to teach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very few passed, and those that did took the class before
  • tests and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Self-Teaching

  • I basically had to teach myself everything
  • you are better off studying on your own
  • unless you enjoy teaching yourself

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years show a durable majority-negative pattern with detailed examples, despite some older positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 528

Course coverage

MATHM059 reviews
MATH037 reviews
M034 reviews
MATH4 reviews
MATH54 reviews
Show 13 more courses
MATHM034 reviews
MATHMO53 reviews
COLLEGEALGEBRA2 reviews
MATH052 reviews
MATHM012 reviews
MATHMO32 reviews
M1 review
MATH011 review
MATH31 review
MATHINT1 review
MATHMO11 review
MTHM031 review
PREALGEBRA1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2