Lucas Mather

PHILM02H · PHILMO7 · PHIL01 · PHILM0172462 · PHILONL · PHILM03 · POLPHIL · PHILLOG · PHILMO1 · PHIL1 · PHL100 · PHILETHI · PHIL2 · PHIL0307 · PHILM02 · PHIL06 · M07LOGIC · PHILM01 · LOGICM07 · PL07 · PHIL102 · PHILPHIL · PHILM09 · PHIL09 · PHILM07 · PHIL07 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 39/100
RMP rating: 3.3/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 2.8

The decision

unless you already like philosophy testing styles and can handle jokes, tangents, and uneven clarity.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHilarious but polarizingParticipation-heavyConfusing testsLecture tangentsInconsistent teaching quality

Fans call him the funniest philosophy professor and say participation plus study guides can work.
Critics say lectures confuse, tests are picky or unclear, and .
Official take-again rate is 0%, and recent .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Some logic sections feel manageable, but and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty varies by course, but philosophy and logic often .

Is attendance flexible?

Avoid

28/100

Reported take-again rate is 0% and recent reviews say he is the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students say participate and follow the study guide; others call him a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Reading and discussion dominate; but .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

He can be hilarious and caring, .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes, midterms, finals, and oral tests are central; participation also matters.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person philosophy and logic courses range from .

Main concern

, and tests that punish students who need structure.

What students said

“ ! .”
PHIL01

“This guy is hilarious and very cool. He is the walking epitome of a dad joke.”
PHILM07

“Horrible teacher that material will be on it.”
PHILM03

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often come from lectures or study guides but .

Lecture-based testsStudy guide sometimes matches examPicky short quizzesFree-response style mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe quizzes scored out of , and occasional study-guide alignment.

Quizzes out of 3Lecture-driven examsStudy guide equals test for some

“His quizzes are out of 3 which means you can get an F, D, or A on them and he is a .”
PHILM03

“READ THE BOOK the study guide he gives IS the exact test SO KNOW IT BY HEART!”
PHIL1

“when he gives you an exam, 90% of it will be from lectures.”
PHIL06

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ ! .”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and split recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Imagine being taught Phil by a stand up comedian..Mather is the funniest person I have ever met!”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ ! .”

🧪

45/100

“Horrible teacher that material will be on it.”

🗣️ Participation Path

54/100

“PARTICIPATING is an easy way to get an A.”

Theme 1

😂 About Humor & Personality

He is the walking epitome of a dad joke.
Funniest teacher I've ever had!
He's inappropriate,arrogant,and rude

Theme 2

📈

.
the study guide he gives IS the exact test
if you are a .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

and .
He never passes back the tests so you can see what you did wrong.
Makes you think ALOT.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with rich detail; opinions are split but volume and consistency patterns are strong.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521

4 out of 511

3 out of 58

2 out of 51

1 out of 514

Course coverage

PHILM078 reviews

PHILM097 reviews

PHIL095 reviews

PHILM015 reviews

PHIL013 reviews

Show 21 more courses

PHILM032 reviews

LOGICM071 review

M07LOGIC1 review

PHIL03071 review

PHIL061 review

PHIL071 review

PHIL11 review

PHIL1021 review

PHIL21 review

PHILETHI1 review

PHILLOG1 review

PHILM01724621 review

PHILM021 review

PHILM02H1 review

PHILMO11 review

PHILMO71 review

PHILONL1 review

PHILPHIL1 review

PHL1001 review

PL071 review

POLPHIL1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

Lucas Mather

x x unless you already like philosophy testing styles and can handle jokes, tangents, and uneven clarity.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Recommended

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

🚫 Recommendation Risk

🧪 x x x

🗣️ Participation Path

😂 About Humor & Personality

📈 x x x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

unless you already like philosophy testing styles and can handle jokes, tangents, and uneven clarity.

🧪

📈