AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Toni Issacs

CDM16 · CDM15 · CDM05 · M15M23 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can teach yourself from the book; and thin instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads PowerPointsBoring lecturesConfusing answersEasy to self-teachMake-up work allowed
  • and relaxed, many
  • Subject is simple enough that self-teaching still yields an easy A
  • Weak content mastery and boring delivery are the main complaints

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Even critics say the subject is simple and you can still get an easy A by teaching yourself and showing up for discussions.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is described as simple; difficulty ratings stay moderate-low.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; one review says attendance not required.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Several students would not recommend due to poor teaching despite a few positive notes on care and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

; relaxed with discussions; subject is easy enough for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

A few tests, group projects, discussions; not described as heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Frequent reports of , and weak answers to questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Discussions, participation, group projects, and about 2-3 tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

participation-friendly for some, PowerPoint-reading and boring for others; .

Main concern

Students report she often cannot answer questions and lectures feel unprepared.

What students said

“Class is always just her reading off of 3-4 PowerPoints it looks like she got online”
CDM05
“Doesn't know material. Reads from the PowerPoint word for word”
M15M23
“Pretty relaxed, very passionate about the subject and cares about her students.”
CDM15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

A few tests plus discussions and group work; .

2-3 testsGroup projectsDiscussion-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

About 2-3 tests with group projects and graded discussions; .

2-3 testsGroup projectsDiscussions
“There are and about 2 or 3 tests.”
CDM15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Luckily, the subjects are simple, so it's still an easy A 'cause you are able to teach yourself!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, , and mixed care. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Sweet person but definitely not a great teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“Really .”

📈 Easy A

78/100

“it's still an easy A 'cause you are able to teach yourself!”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“very nice and caring. I took the class online so a lot of videos but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • reading off of 3-4 PowerPoints
  • Reads from the PowerPoint word for word
  • Very boring and long

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's still an easy A 'cause you are able to teach yourself!
  • Add your opinion to the discussions and show up and you'll do fine.
  • she allows you to go back and make up work if you missed any

Theme 3

⚠️ About Mastery

  • Doesn't know material.
  • Really doesn't seem to understand the subject matter
  • Doesn't even !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

5 reviews from 2014-2019 with mixed but recurring negative teaching themes; limited grade detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDM152 reviews
CDM051 review
CDM161 review
M15M231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values