AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Kristin Gibson

M10 · SOCM01 · SOCMO1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you must take Sociology with her and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyRude ResponsesNo Clear RubricMandatory Attendance
  • Students report rude responses and .
  • Class is lecture-heavy with several tests, essays, and a high-stakes group presentation.
  • as mandatory and skipping hurts your chance to pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even students who study hard report poor grades because , and tests demand tiny lecture details.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is detail-heavy with , and lecture material that is hard to track without perfect notes.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

; most describe rudeness, favorites, and as deal-breakers.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and students say she blames them for low scores while .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and a final right after create a heavy semester load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few students , but most call her rude, unhelpful, and unwilling to answer questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Grades hinge on multiple tests, a , and an end-of-term .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person Sociology runs lecture-heavy with , and .

Main concern

, and detail-obsessed tests make an A feel unfairly hard.

What students said

“ and when you ask for it youre given a cruel response.”
SOCMO1
“Just plain horrible!She is extremely rude and its very obvious she had favorites.”
SOCM01
“She's extremely rude and does not like questions.”
M10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

study guides, which students find punitive.

Multiple In-Person TestsFinal After Test 4No Study GuidesDetail-Heavy Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a and little advance structure.

4 Tests Plus FinalNo Study GuidesLecture Detail Focus
“NO study guides, 4 tests and a final right after test 4”
SOCMO1
“Stuff from the lectures are on the tests, so you need to come to class in order to pass.”
M10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just plain horrible!She is extremely rude and its very obvious she had favorites.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2018-2019, highlighting teaching climate, grading, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Climate

28/100

“She's extremely rude and does not like questions.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“ and when you ask for it youre given a cruel response.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This class is extremely lecture heavy.
  • Professor Gibson is a solid choice for Sociology.
  • She understands the course material and is able to convey it very well in lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She expects students to know every little detail thats not even in the .
  • I studied so much for this class and yet I received bad grades.
  • She expects you to work for your grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is extremely rude and its very obvious she had favorites.
  • She tends to blame students all the time for their poor grade.
  • when you ask for it youre given a cruel response.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four detailed in-person reviews from late 2018 to early 2019; tone is mostly consistent but sample size is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

M102 reviews
SOCM011 review
SOCMO11 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values