AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Colleen Coffey

WOMENSHISTORY · HISTUSWOMEN · HISTM12 · HISTM25 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Consider her only if and rigid policies; recent online experiences are cautionary.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingClear StructureInspirational ContentRigid DeadlinesEnthusiastic Lecturer
  • Older in-person reviews praise funny, motivating women's history teaching.
  • Recent online reviews slam inflexibility around emergencies and .
  • Expect and ; tests are fair if you read.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

and easy tests appear if you read, but and rigid online policies keep an A from being free.

; recent online reviews include an F and no flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Subject matter is engaging, but and several papers keep the course from being light.

; online adds retention warnings.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and stress participation, with little grace for absences or emergencies.

Online evidence is explicit; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Classic reviews strongly recommend her, but the .

In-person nostalgia is positive; online recent reviews advise against her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

strong easy-A or harsh-grader consensus.

Format shift

In-person comments say fair; online focuses .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and documentaries make the load substantial.

Format shift

; online adds retention demands.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Strong subject enthusiasm and clarity compete with recent criticism of unhelpful, unkind communication.

Format shift

In-person historical praise is high; online recent quality scores are low.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Students mention and .

Format shift

In person cites outlines and papers; online emphasizes reading retention and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person historical reviews describe enthusiastic lectures, lots of , and .

Main concern

Reading load and multiple papers can overwhelm underprepared students.

What students said

“She is one of the . Lectures are not boring, and she knows her stuff.”
WOMENSHISTORY
“There was a *lot* of reading. Several books to purchase or find at library.”
HISTM25
“Lots of reading, but the if YOU READ THE MATERIAL!”
HISTUSWOMEN

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and content-rich but students report little flexibility and cold responses to medical or emergency issues.

Main concern

Impatient communication and zero room for emergencies can tank the experience.

What students said

“One thing I didn't appreciate is her attitude towards emails. She is impatient and unwilling to provide extra guidance if asked.”
HISTM25
“God forbid you have a medical condition or an emergency! She will not allow room for any of that.”
HISTM25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests appear manageable with outlines and .

Lecture Outlines For TestsReading-Based ExamsMultiple PapersDocumentaries

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and wrote several papers after substantial reading.

Lecture OutlinesReading-Based TestsSeveral Papers
“She provided lecture outlines for every lecture. Great resource for tests. .”
HISTM25
“Lots of reading, but the if YOU READ THE MATERIAL!”
HISTUSWOMEN

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; and .

Clear Due DatesReading Retention Critical
“Online Course is planned out well. , and content.”
HISTM25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have a hard time with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 mixed-era reviews, contrasting older in-person praise with recent online flexibility concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Classic Teaching Praise

80/100

“I loved Coffeys class. She teaches things you actually want to learn about.”

📚 Reading Load

32/100

“There was a *lot* of reading. Several books to purchase or find at library.”

🧊 Online Flexibility Issues

20/100

“she is a good professor & keeps it interesting. however her lack for human kindness is 0%.”

👍 Overall Recommendation Split

42/100

“ and always in a happy mood. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are not boring, and she knows her stuff.
  • She is funny and very smart, good at teaching in a way that everyone can relate.
  • She is motivated in the subject matter.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of reading, but the if YOU READ THE MATERIAL!
  • and always in a happy mood.
  • if you have a hard time with .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Policies

  • She is impatient and unwilling to provide extra guidance if asked.
  • beware if you have a medical condition.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven reviews, with a long and two negative recent online reports.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HISTM253 reviews
WOMENSHISTORY2 reviews
HISTM121 review
HISTUSWOMEN1 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values