AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hasmik Mkrtchyan

MO1 · MATHM03 · MO5 · M03 · MTHM01 · M05 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in , and can handle a low-patience classroom climate.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerThick Accent BarrierLow PatienceTough GraderLots of HomeworkHigh Drop Rate
  • Many students struggle with her accent and feel discouraged when asking questions.
  • Homework and participation load is high, with and .
  • A minority find her fair and helpful if you attend, ask carefully, and put in full effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Reported grades lean B/C with and little cushion; easy As are not supported by comments.

; the one online review said helps if you fully engage.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content plus communication barriers and fast loss of patience make the class feel hard even at intro level.

In-person students found it harder to learn; one online student called difficulty fair with effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several tags and comments say skip and you will not pass; attendance and participation matter heavily.

and in-person notes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

, and grading; only a few keep her as a backup option.

In-person recommendation is largely negative; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags and mercy.

Format shift

Harsh tone dominates in person; online review noted opportunities.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework and participation expectations create a heavy ongoing load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Knows the math but many students say she teaches poorly, loses patience, and discourages questions.

Format shift

; one online review was more positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of homework, participation, tests, and .

Format shift

; in person also mentions group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most in-person reviews are strongly negative about patience, accent clarity, condescension, and .

Main concern

Students report snide reactions to questions and feeling forced to learn alone.

What students said

“She has an incredibly thick accent and gets angry with people who have a .”
MO1
“This teacher is very condescending and passive-aggressive.”
MTHM01
“She has no patience. She knows her stuff but she is not good at teaching.”
MATHM03

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

tough but , and success if , and ask questions.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Her accent isn't so bad and but fair. She gives opportunity for .”
MO5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as tough; one online student called them fair with , while .

Tough but Fair ExamsExtra Credit PossibleParticipation MattersTest Failures Reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and at least one whole-class test failure, with limited exam-format detail.

Tough GradingClass-Wide Test FailureFew Tests
“The entire class failed a test and she acted as if we were incompetent and we obviously needed to try harder.”
MTHM01

Online

but fair with available.

Tough but Fair ExamsExtra Credit
“Her accent isn't so bad and but fair. She gives opportunity for .”
MO5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has no patience. She knows her stuff but she is not good at teaching. If your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting classroom climate, teaching clarity, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She knows her stuff but she is not good at teaching. If you ask her Q's she will get mad.”

👎 Classroom Climate

22/100

“She has an incredibly thick accent and gets angry with people who have a .”

📚 Workload and Effort

28/100

“People who don't do well are the , but it's college, what do you expect?”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

28/100

“May not be your first choice, but keep as a second or third.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • thick accent and gets angry
  • condescending and passive-aggressive
  • not good at teaching
  • loses her patience very easily

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • but fair
  • entire class failed a test
  • half of our class dropped

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very helpful and kind
  • Caring
  • She means well
  • accessible outside class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews over a short span, but themes about accent, patience, and toughness are highly consistent.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATHM032 reviews
M031 review
M051 review
MO11 review
MO51 review
Show 1 more courses
MTHM011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values