AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Joanna Miller

MO1 · JOURM01 · JOUR01 · JOURNM01A · JOURNMO1 · JOURM10 · JOURN01 · JOUR111 · JOURN1 · JOURM10A · JOURMO3 · JOURM15 · M01 · JOURM10B · JOURM02 · JM01JM10 · JOURMO2 · JOURNM01 · JOURNM10 · MO10B · JOURMO1 · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and thrive on hands-on journalism work; otherwise expect frustration.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedPolarizing personalityGroup-project heavyCaring if you engageConfusing instructions
  • Students split hard between caring mentor and .
  • As and easy work are common if , and group projects.
  • Online and hybrid sections draw the harshest complaints about communication and clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most students say an A is realistic if you finish the , and group projects even when lectures feel weak.

Both online and in-person reviews say As are reachable; online stresses weekly chapter volume more.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is introductory journalism and mass comm, but pacing and concepts alone.

; online is mainly quizzes and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

34/100

Many sections treat attendance and in-class participation as .

In-person reviews stress participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half the voices love her care and real-world skills while the and tone.

; online reviews skew more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Reported grades cluster at A when work is submitted, with curves and mentioned.

Format shift

Online and in-person both report easy As if .

Workload

Moderate

44/100

, and newsroom work add up, especially in production classes.

Format shift

Online piles chapter quizzes; .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Knowledge and care appear often, but confusion, disorganization, delayed emails, and condescension dominate many accounts.

Format shift

Online reviews hit communication hardest; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades rest , and participation rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Same assignment-heavy pattern across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often described as caring and knowledgeable for majors, but , and harsh on publication mistakes, with frequent group projects and .

Main concern

, and personality clashes can sour an otherwise passable class.

What students said

“Joanna genuinely cares about every single one of her students”
JOURNM01
“This class was a joke... listen to her talk about ”
JOURMO1
“Professor Miller's class is an easy A.”
M01

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

slow or and group work, with grades still reachable if you grind assignments.

Main concern

Poor organization and condescending tone make online support unreliable.

What students said

“My online experience in this class was a nightmare”
JOURM01
“Terrible communication skills for a class that was literally called Mass communications. Easy though.”
JOURNMO1
“Do the , and you'll get an A easy”
JOURM01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments center on frequent quizzes and course work; .

Weekly quizzesUnpredictable quiz contentMultiple choice from bookParticipation activities

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and publication work; closed-book proctoring is not clearly proven.

QuizzesParticipation pointsPublication work
“if , but you will miss the in class participation activities”
JOURM01
“ because there will be questions about the lectures when she didn't even finish the lecture.”
JOURM01

Online

Online students report heavy weekly quizzes and discussions, sometimes unpredictable, with As if nothing is missed.

Weekly quizzesChapter-based testsDiscussions
“ . There is a lot of work (3 chapters/quizzes/discussions per week)”
JOURM01
“Literally never used the book and and quizzes.”
JOURNMO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Getting As isn't difficult, but you will have to do work and you will learn a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (7 online, 43 in person), highlighting split teaching quality, easy grades, and organization pain. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She's very unresponsive to emails, uses a , and not to mention she's not clear on the instructions”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“Professor Miller's class is an easy A.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ but she teaches other JOUR classes so good luck.”

❤️ Care for Students

70/100

“Joanna is the most caring and passionate teacher! She genuinely cares about her students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and a
  • lectures droned on and were unhelpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Getting As isn't difficult, but you will have to do work
  • easy A
  • Do the , and you'll get an A easy

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload & Groups

  • There's always an article to work on
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning years with detailed, consistent themes on organization, ease of grades, and group work support a high-confidence read.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 512
3 out of 519
2 out of 514
1 out of 518

Course coverage

JOURM0112 reviews
JOURMO18 reviews
JOURM10A4 reviews
JOURNM014 reviews
JOUR012 reviews
Show 16 more courses
JOURMO22 reviews
JOURNM01A2 reviews
JOURNMO12 reviews
M012 reviews
JM01JM101 review
JOUR1111 review
JOURM021 review
JOURM101 review
JOURM10B1 review
JOURM151 review
JOURMO31 review
JOURN011 review
JOURN11 review
JOURNM101 review
MO11 review
MO10B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 9

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values