AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Davis Karen

M15 · MATH15 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution and verify current teaching quality— and possible weak preparation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderMandatory attendanceUnprepared lecturesHeavy homeworkPolarized clarity
  • Only two reviews exist and they conflict .
  • Both agree she is a .
  • One student dropped a summer stats class over preparation and teaching quality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough grading tags and a and may still be hard.

All evidence is in person from only two reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Introductory statistics content is standard, but teaching confusion and workload raise the felt challenge.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and and skipping means you will not pass.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

One yes and one strong no with a tiny sample.

In-person only; two conflicting reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

as a defining trait.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework and lecture-heavy structure are explicitly tagged.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

One student praises clarity while the .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize participation, homework, and .

Format shift

In-person only; sparse detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH15/M15 feedback is split: but extremely strict, the other calls summer stats unprepared and drop-worthy.

Main concern

a drop.

What students said

“ . .”
MATH15
“Karen did not put any effort into teaching this class, was very unprepared, and .”
M15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; and attendance-linked.

Clear grading criteriaTough gradingLecture heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; and .

Tough graderMandatory attendance
“ . With good participation and study habits, you can pass with a pretty good grade.”
MATH15
“ .”
M15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 and conflicting teaching quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“was very unprepared, and ”

⚖️

18/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • did not put any effort into teaching this class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews provide too little consistent detail for strong confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

M151 review
MATH151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values