AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Marjorie Leerabhandh

CHEMM12 · CHEMM01A · M12 · INTROCHEM · BIOLM01 · CHEMM01 · CHEMMO12 · CHEMM1276937 · CHEM · CHEM12 · 77 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if and use her notes and practice materials; otherwise choose a more supportive intro chem professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough GraderWeekly QuizzesPractice ExamsSelf Study Heavy
  • Reviews are sharply split between best chem teacher and .
  • , and practice exams reward disciplined studiers.
  • First-time chemistry students who need hand-holding often struggle and feel dismissed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Repeatedly described as not an easy A; students who earn high grades report heavy studying and full use of practice materials.

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Chemistry content plus fast pace and weekly assessments make the course intellectually demanding for many.

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

and quizzes, but some report doing well mainly from notes and tests.

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Loyal fans strongly recommend her for serious learners, while a .

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Tough grader tag and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and frequent chapter tests create constant workload.

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and vague, unhelpful, hard-to-understand lectures.

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals all matter; practice exams help.

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Large in-person chem sample is highly polarized: , and fairness for hard workers, while many others call her vague, unhelpful, and harsh.

Main concern

Beginners report confusion, unhelpful answers, and .

What students said

“Class was not easy, but she helped you do well. .”
CHEM12
“Not an easy A, definitely going to be working for it.”
CHEMM12
“WORST TEACHER EVER... gives.”
CHEMM1276937

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments track lecture notes closely, with frequent quizzes and practice exams; .

Weekly QuizzesPractice ExamsLecture-Based TestsCheat Sheet Final SometimesLabs

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report weekly quizzes, tests every few chapters, practice exams, and .

Weekly QuizzesPractice ExamsTests Every Few ChaptersCheat Sheet Final
“ .”
CHEM12
“There are .”
INTROCHEM
“YOU GET TO HAVE A .”
BIOLM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class was not easy, but she helped you do well. . You have to attend these.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person chemistry reviews spanning many years, capturing both strong praise and strong criticism. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

48/100

“one of THE .”

📚 Resources Help Hard Workers

62/100

“She provides ALL the lecture notes, so there r PLENTY of resources.”

🧱 Not An Easy A

34/100

“Not an easy A, definitely going to be working for it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really cared to help you learn.
  • She's vague and seems to have no interest in being there.
  • She teaches the material clearly and knows her stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A, definitely going to be working for it.
  • I got an A by working hard, turning in all .

Theme 3

🧪

  • She also provided online lecture notes.
  • .
  • the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

77

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty long-span reviews with rich detail and repeated themes provide strong but polarized evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 57
3 out of 58
2 out of 515
1 out of 520

Course coverage

CHEM1219 reviews
CHEMM1219 reviews
CHEMM013 reviews
CHEM2 reviews
721531 review
Show 6 more courses
BIOLM011 review
CHEMM01A1 review
CHEMM12769371 review
CHEMMO121 review
INTROCHEM1 review
M121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values