AI Rate Professor

English

Jack Ahrens

ENGM01A · M01A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you ; skip if you want discussion-focused English without political digressions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSo many papersEffort-based gradesPolitical rants riskFlexible attendanceClear criteria when asked
  • .
  • Workload is paper-heavy and can overwhelm some students.
  • Reviews split between friendly helper and off-topic political ranter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report A and turn work in on time.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not theoretically brutal, but the sheer volume of .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

though easy classwork rewards showing up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About three-quarters would take him again for .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Effort and weak in English.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Repeated SO MANY PAPERS tags and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call him friendly and helpful; others say he rants politically and teaches little writing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Course is almost entirely essays and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and easy points for effort, but quality swings hard based on whether students tolerate his classroom style.

Main concern

and possible political rants that kill engagement.

What students said

“If you do all of the work you will pass easily.”
ENGM01A
“Ahrens is the worst. Being an English teacher he has the opportunity to teach writing and . Instead he uses the class to rant about his political beliefs”
M01A
“its basically all essays, i had to drop out, it was way too much for me to handle.”
M01A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; grade is driven by several essays and in-class work.

Multiple essaysResearch paperGimme classwork points

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Three essays plus a if you attend.

3 essays plus research paperEasy classwork pointsConfusing prompts at times
“There are 3 essays and a . Turn in and you will be fine.”
M01A
“All his other work that .”
M01A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and there are a lot of them but as long as you show some effort into them, you should get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He is very friendly and is willing to help.”

📄 Paper Overload

32/100

“its basically all essays, i had to drop out, it was way too much for me to handle.”

🅰️ Grade for Effort

78/100

“as long as you show some effort into them, you should get a good grade.”

🗳️ Polarizing Style

40/100

“Instead he uses the class to rant about his political beliefs, most of his "facts" are incorrect.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very friendly and is willing to help.
  • I have NEVER been so apathetic about attending class.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you do all of the work you will pass easily.
  • Is lenient with late papers and attendance
  • Turn in and you will be fine.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • there are a lot of them

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

and limited time span reduce confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

M01A5 reviews
ENGM01A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values