AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ronald McCamy

PHILM0137050 · PHILM01 · PHILOPM01 · PHILO1000 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILM02 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-teach philosophy and chase him for feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCancels OftenSelf-Teach RequiredUnresponsive EmailsConfusing LecturesLight Homework
  • Frequently cancels class and grades slowly or not at all.
  • Students must self-teach and initiate help; lectures often confuse.
  • who engage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and easy quizzes help, but you must attend, read, and self-advocate to land a strong grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is not advanced, but and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

as and presence still affect success, and he cancels often.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students report , and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but slow returns and sparse feedback frustrate students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

; mostly readings, easy quizzes, and a final.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Described as sweet but , and hard to reach.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Few assignments; , and a final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person philosophy with , and discussion-heavy expectations; quiet students struggle.

Main concern

, and slow or missing grades.

What students said

“never ”
PHILM02
“he canceled class half the semester. Majority of the class would probably agree that they had NO IDEA what he was talking about”
PHILM0137050
“you'll teach yourself more than he'll teach you. He cancels class A LOT & is not a ”
PHILM01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and finals are often easy if you track major ideas and readings; format details are sparse.

Easy QuizzesStudy Guides Match TestsCake FinalLittle Homework

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are often described as easy when study guides or major ideas are followed.

Easy QuizzesCake FinalStudy Guides Match Tests
“Pay attention to major ideas for the ( ”
PHILM01
“there was barley hw and quizzes and the ”
PHILOSOPHY
“study guides were exactly the same as tests”
PHILM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you'll teach yourself more than he'll teach you. He cancels class A LOT & is not a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews spanning 2011-2017, highlighting cancellations, self-teaching, and light workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Majority of the class would probably agree that they had NO IDEA what he was talking about when he was there”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ . waste of a class..”

📚

68/100

“you'll teach yourself more than he'll teach you”

🪶 Workload

78/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • never
  • knows his stuff..
  • He's a very sweet guy, but if you're shy and never speak in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • study guides were exactly the same as tests
  • I still haven't received my grade after a month

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • Never returned my emails
  • I emailed him three different times asking questions about the course and he never responded

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven mostly older in-person reviews with consistent complaints about organization and clarity, but limited recent grade data.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHILM015 reviews
PHILM022 reviews
PHILM01370501 review
PHILO10001 review
PHILOPM011 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILOSOPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values