AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Toni Isaacs

CDM02 · CDM23 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you need a light child-development elective; skip if .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy online optionSpeeds through slidesGives good feedbackMixed teaching fit
  • Online CDM23 is widely seen as an easy, low-effort A with quick quizzes and light papers.
  • In-person CDM02 felt rushed and .
  • Personality is described as nice, but lecture pacing is a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Online students report A+ work with minimal reading and short quizzes, though .

Easy A evidence is almost entirely from the single online review; grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Online content is described as trivial, while and harder.

Online feels introductory; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

In-person attendance was reported as mandatory; .

Mandatory attendance noted only for in-person CDM02; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

One student would take her again for an easy online A, while another dropped after a poor lecture fit.

Online review is positive; rating.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Online path produced an A+ with light work; little evidence of .

Format shift

Leniency is supported mainly by the online A+ review.

Workload

Light

78/100

Weekly posts and ; a .

Format shift

Light workload is from online only; because the student dropped.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Nice professor with good feedback online, but .

Format shift

Online quality rated 4; in-person quality rated 2 with a withdrawal.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessments center on discussion posts, quizzes, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Student found lectures long but rushed through slides, confusing even with prior human-development background, and dropped.

Main concern

and weak lecture clarity for some learners.

What students said

“even though the lecture still takes a long time, she speeds through all the slides.”
CDM02

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Easy online class with short weekly posts and for CD majors.

Main concern

Only one online review, so depth of .

What students said

“If you're looking for an ... and quizzes take 5 mins to complete, even if you don't do the reading.”
CDM23

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize short quizzes and .

QuizzesPapers and projects

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online work is short weekly quizzes plus a .

Weekly quizzesDiscussion postsPapers/projects
“ and quizzes take 5 mins to complete, even if you don't do the reading.”
CDM23

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an if you're a CD major or you work with kids/want to work with kids.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews spanning online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Fit Split

50/100

“Ms. as a person, but her teaching style did not work well for me.”

😌 Easy Online Load

78/100

“ and quizzes take 5 mins to complete, even if you don't do the reading.”

⚡ Rushed Lectures

35/100

“even though the lecture still takes a long time, she speeds through all the slides.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Ease

  • easy online class
  • quizzes take 5 mins
  • everything is easy

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • very nice as a person
  • teaching style did not work well for me
  • speeds through all the slides

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2015-2017, split by format and outcome, with limited grade and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDM021 review
CDM231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1