AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Grethe Wygant

MATHM25A · MATHM5 · MATH05 · MATH25A · CALC25C · CLASSSECTION · MATHMO5 · MATH4A4B · MATH25B · MATHM03 · ALGM04B · MATHM25B · CALC25AH · MTH3 · MATHM01 · M03 · MO3 · MATHM07 · CALC25A · MATHMO1 · MATHMO4A · MATH4B · MATHMO7 · MATHM09 · MATHM15 · MATHM05 · MATH25AH · MATH03 · 91 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Prefer her for lower-level algebra if you will grind homework; if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkClear for Lower MathStruggles in CalculusExtra Credit AvailableFast Paced
  • Stronger in intermediate algebra and lower-level courses than in calculus sequences
  • and often the main complaint
  • Caring and approachable for many, but calculus students report self-teaching

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and curves help, but heavy homework and , especially in calc.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Lower algebra can feel manageable; calculus and late-start sections feel fast, dense, and self-taught.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Showing up matters for notes and pacing; many say do the homework and attend every day to pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; frequently warned against for calculus courses.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and curves exist, but tests can .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated reports of hours of and MyMathLab loads that dominate the week.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Clear and patient in lower math for many; rushed, book-reading, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and finals; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some terms, and a sharp split between lower-level praise and calculus criticism.

Main concern

and weak calculus instruction force self-teaching for many students.

What students said

“By far Wygant is the .”
M03
“The homework takes 7-12 hours per class, so 14-24 a week.”
MATH25B
“ !! and goes over them when you don't understand.”
MATHM03

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but can feel much harder than practice, especially in calculus.

Tests from homework/book examplesGroup quizzesHard finalsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some group or open-book quizzes and hard cumulative finals.

In-person examsGroup quizzesOpen-book quizzes sometimes
“the . The tests are brutal, no one walks out early.”
MATHM25A
“ .”
CALC25A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far Wygant is the . I went in being pretty crappy at math but and teaching style made me feel like I was actually getting it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting homework load and course-level teaching split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“She assigns SO !”

👍 Lower-Level Success

75/100

“ !! and goes over them when you don't understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained the concepts very well, and took the if you didn't understand.
  • Found myself re-teaching the entire class to myself.
  • Teaches as if u already kno the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's not an easy A, but with math it never is.
  • and quizzes
  • and it just made me hate math

Theme 3

📝

  • The .
  • Tons of hw, but .
  • HW was turned in at the end of the week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

91

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with a clear course-level split and and teaching themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 514
3 out of 514
2 out of 510
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH25B5 reviews
MATHM034 reviews
MATHM074 reviews
M033 reviews
MATHMO13 reviews
Show 23 more courses
CALC25A2 reviews
CALC25AH2 reviews
CALC25C2 reviews
MATH052 reviews
MATH25A2 reviews
MATH25AH2 reviews
MATHM012 reviews
MATHMO4A2 reviews
ALGM04B1 review
CLASSSECTION1 review
MATH031 review
MATH4A4B1 review
MATH4B1 review
MATHM051 review
MATHM091 review
MATHM151 review
MATHM25A1 review
MATHM25B1 review
MATHM51 review
MATHMO51 review
MATHMO71 review
MO31 review
MTH31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values