AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Massoud Saleh

M04 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

High risk with tiny sample; if you need CAD skills and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing CAD InstructorHeavy Group ProjectMandatory AttendanceHands-On SoftwareInconsistent Experience
  • Only two reviews, completely split between excellent CAD coverage and awful teaching attitude.
  • Class is extensive with Autocad and Creo plus a heavy group project.
  • ; outcomes depend heavily on whether you connect with his style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

One student earned an A- ; the other found the project extremely difficult and unclear.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is extensive for beginners and the as very heavy and hard.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; the other calls him awful and would not.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Limited grade detail; one A- .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and extremely difficult with long readings.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

strong software coverage versus negative attitude and poor teaching method.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Heavy group project and CAD work dominate the described assessment load.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person CAD course covering Autocad and Creo with a ; experiences range from skill-building to discouraging.

Main concern

and possible negative teaching attitude.

What students said

“i had no background in cad but he covered both Autocad and Creo very well.”
M04
“He has a negative attitude and poor teaching method that makes this class not only unenjoyable, but discouraging.”
M04

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize CAD practice and a .

Group Project HeavySoftware CAD Focus

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence centers on CAD software mastery and a .

Group Project HeavyAutocad and Creo
“the but .”
M04
“ and extremely difficult. Posted 200 pages to read about it...”
M04

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is extensive. i had no background in cad but he covered both Autocad and Creo very well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with conflicting tones. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“He has a negative attitude and poor teaching method that makes this class not only unenjoyable, but discouraging.”

💻 CAD Skill Gain

70/100

“Can do CAD with 2 software now :)”

📦 Project Load

32/100

“ and extremely difficult. Posted 200 pages to read about it...”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he covered both Autocad and Creo very well.
  • negative attitude and poor teaching method
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • The class is extensive.
  • the but .
  • and extremely difficult.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from 2016 limit confidence; detail is useful but sample size is too small for strong conclusions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

M042 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1