AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kathryn Fink

MATHM31 · M25A · M25B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take her only if and handle a ; otherwise expect a grind.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful but monotoneTest-heavy calcPartial creditBoring lecturesSkips steps
  • Calc courses are broad and .
  • Students split between finding her helpful with and .
  • ; success depends on staying engaged despite a dry delivery.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A and mixed fairness on tests.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Calc content is broad and paced as if students already know terms, with high reported difficulty.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others do not, so policy is inconsistent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

A few would take her again for help and real-world examples, but and dry lectures.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Partial credit helps some students, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

but not collected; grades .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Willing to help and share applications, yet often monotone, skips steps, and loses the room.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; some praise help and partial credit while others call lectures monotone and .

Main concern

Grade and uneven explanations.

What students said

“She . but her course covers almost everything.”
M25B
“The grade is . No . .”
M25A
“she is a very very boring teacher, so paying attention is difficult”
MATHM31

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment ; fairness is debated and support outside exams is thin.

Multiple in-person testsFinal examPartial creditNo extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests plus a final, sometimes with partial credit and no .

Multiple testsFinal examPartial creditNo homework collected
“The grading criteria is 3 tests and a final.”
MATHM31
“The grade is . No . .”
M25A
“She .”
M25B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Id say she is one of the better calc professors at moorpark college.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ . She .”

📉

32/100

“The .”

😴 Lecture Energy

40/100

“she is a very very boring teacher, so paying attention is difficult”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really monotone. She tries to be fun
  • She finds the subject very interesting and tells you how some problems are applied

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The grade is
  • but her course covers almost everything
  • people who pay attention do learn the subject

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews (2014-2016) with mixed grades and limited detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

M25A1 review
M25B1 review
MATHM311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1