AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Linda Loiselle

PATHO01 · NS2 · NSM02 · NURSICLIN · NS02 · PATHO001 · NSTHER · COLLEGESTRATEG · NS · PATHOPHYSIOLOGY · COL1 · HS25 · COLM01 · HSM25 · NSNS · NSM25 · NS2A · NURSING2 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; expect poor teaching, disorganization, and clinical rudeness.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads PowerPointsDisorganizedRude clinical styleGrading errorsBusy work
  • Many students say , and teaches little usable content.
  • rude, unsupportive, and preferential.
  • Online sections add busy work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some call it an easy A with easy assignments, but others and incomplete fails.

Online reviews stress grading mistakes; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty varies widely by course; content is not always hard but structure and .

Online busy work can feel light yet chaotic; in-person patho and clinicals feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is marked mandatory in some sections and .

; one in-person nursing review says mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews urge avoiding her for poor teaching, rudeness, and disorganization despite a few soft positives.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students report , and refusal to fix mistakes despite some easy assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews especially document lost A .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Easy assignments and busy work coexist with heavy 8-week versions and .

Format shift

Online leans busy work; some in-person accelerated sections feel overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is reading PowerPoints, poor grammar, conflicting answers, and rude clinical teaching.

Format shift

Online and ; clinical rudeness is in-person specific.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of easy assignments, quizzes with typos, and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes graded assignments and group projects; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person nursing and patho students repeatedly cite slide reading, surprise tests, disorganization, and rude clinical behavior; a .

Main concern

Rude clinicals, conflicting answers, and .

What students said

“She reads off powerpoints, her test questions come out of nowhere and sometimes it's not covered.”
NSM02
“She is rude, unsupportive, judgemental, and often makes rude comments to you in front of clients.”
NURSICLIN
“ . I felt I did not learn ANYTHING from this class.”
PATHO001

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online health classes feel like busy work with slide-reading lectures, group projects, and grades.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and unfair. I received a B in her class when I earned an A because she did not grade an ”
HSM25
“A lot of busy work online. .”
NSM25
“The lectures are .”
HSM25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often feel random or error-filled while ; proctoring details are not described.

Tests from uncovered materialTypos on quizzesEasy assignments buffer grades

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report tests on never-discussed material and proctoring notes.

Tests on uncovered materialQuiz typosEasy assignments
“ .”
PATHO001
“ ”
COLM01

Online

Reviews focus on graded assignments, typos, and busy .

Busy workGroup projectsGrading errors
“make sure you print as proof that you completed them because she will not go back and double check her errors in grading”
HSM25
“A lot of busy work online. .”
NSM25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (4 online, 23 in-person), highlighting poor teaching, clinical rudeness, and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She reads off powerpoints, her test questions come out of nowhere and sometimes it's not covered.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ ”

⚖️

28/100

“I received a B in her class when I earned an A because she did not grade an ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She reads off powerpoints
  • Lecture consists of
  • cannot teach to save her life

Theme 2

🏥 About Clinical Experience

  • Her clinical is disastrous
  • She's probably one of the rudest instructor's I've ever had
  • rude, unsupportive, judgemental

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A for a UC transferable class
  • there was a lot of easy assignments
  • There is no way of knowing how to study for her test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews across many years and courses show highly consistent complaints about teaching quality, organization, and clinical rudeness.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 512

Course coverage

COLM015 reviews
HSM253 reviews
NURSICLIN3 reviews
NSM022 reviews
COL11 review
Show 13 more courses
COLLEGESTRATEG1 review
HS251 review
NS1 review
NS021 review
NS21 review
NS2A1 review
NSM251 review
NSNS1 review
NSTHER1 review
NURSING21 review
PATHO0011 review
PATHO011 review
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values