AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

Erica Reiner

ENSCM01 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Fine for a relatively easy environmental science credit if you can tolerate lateness and disorganization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOften lateEasy projectsDisorganizedSlow emailsLecture covers book
  • Work is fairly easy if and readings, but organization and lateness frustrate students.
  • Lectures can cover the book well for some while .
  • Email response and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report easy work and few tests; doing projects and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is described as pretty simple and not conceptually brutal, though .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and not mandatory in another.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and loved lectures; others warn majors and cite disorganization and lateness.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Easy projects and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Few projects and tests, but and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some love lectures and ; , and weak with technology.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Projects and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person environmental science with , and mixed lecture quality.

Main concern

Chronic lateness, slow emails, and .

What students said

“The work is easy but and is often not relevant to what is being taught.”
ENSCM01
“do the and the book assignments because there aren't many of them so .”
71746
“Very unorganized, takes long ”
ENSCM01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on projects and book work with few tests; but .

Very few testsProject-heavyLecture-based tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Very few tests and ; test questions can lack clarity despite coming from lecture notes.

Few testsProjects worth a lotLecture-note tests
“ . Easy if you do the .”
71746
“ lack of clarity within questions despite them being taken from lecture notes.”
ENSCM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took both her lecture and lab and I loved her lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting easy workload, lateness, and mixed teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She could be a and scatter-brained at times but I think that was mostly because she was so new to the school.”

📗 Easy Credit Path

78/100

“it's pretty simple: do the and the book assignments”

⏰ Reliability Issues

35/100

“Be prepared for her to be late for class, usually about 15-30 minutes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I loved her lectures
  • doesn't understand technology or know how to teach
  • semi-decent lectures that are a gamble of whether or not they'll keep you engaged

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work is easy but
  • Easy if you do the reading

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews from 2014-2016 show a coherent mixed picture but limited sample size and older dates.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENSCM013 reviews
717462 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values