AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael Rosenthal

PHILM07 · PHILMO1 · PHILM12 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

Only take him if you need an easy philosophy A and ; .

Best fit · Easy A HunterTangent HeavyEasy Extra CreditOff-Topic StoriesLow Effort AInconsistent Teaching
  • Students say lectures wander into personal stories, cats, and TV instead of philosophy.
  • Grades are easy if you do , even after weak midterm scores.
  • Teaching quality is seen as weak or joke-level despite low difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

and a after a 50 percent midterm.

All .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Difficulty ratings are very low and students treat the material as easy if they read the book.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One student attended every class while noting the professor often did not; .

and only from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Students call him a joke, urge saving your time, and criticize off-topic inappropriate stories.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Overall points plus easy let .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Main work is reading, midterm, final, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

When he stays on topic he is okay, but reviews stress tangents, absences, and inappropriate stories.

Format shift

Teaching comments are from in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and plentiful on a total-points system.

Format shift

Assessment comments are from in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person philosophy sections feel unfocused with long tangents; grades are recoverable through easy on a .

Main concern

Class time is often wasted on unrelated personal stories instead of philosophy content.

What students said

“This professor is a joke. I attended every class, although he did not.”
PHILMO1
“as long as you do all the you'll get an A as his grades are based on an ”
PHILM12
“He repeatedly goes off on tangent after tangent than actually teaching the class.”
PHILM07

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist but .

MidtermFinalExtra Credit RecoveryPoints System

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention a midterm, final, and easy under a .

MidtermFinalExtra Credit RecoveryPoints System
“I got a 50/100 on my midterm,but with the easy assignments I was able to go into the .”
PHILM12
“Do , and read book for extra clarity.”
PHILM07

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is a joke. I attended every class, although he did not.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting tangents and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He repeatedly goes off on tangent after tangent than actually teaching the class.”

🅰️ Easy

84/100

“as long as you do all the you'll get an A as his grades are based on an .”

👎 Recommendation Level

28/100

“Advice, SAVE YOUR TIME!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He repeatedly goes off on tangent after tangent than actually teaching the class.
  • He spoke more about his girlfriends (which I doubt he had) and his cats.
  • when he actually teaches, he's okay and .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • with the easy assignments I was able to go into the .
  • Do , and read book for extra clarity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older in-person reviews with limited grade detail make the picture thin and less reliable.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILM071 review
PHILM121 review
PHILMO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values