AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Carlos Cordova

GRM30 · GRM31 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you stay current; small sample so expectations can vary.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient with questionsStrong design knowledgeHelpful with AdobeConfusing for beginnersSupportive professor
  • Two of three reviews call him top-notch and .
  • One student found a beginning class confusing and struggled after an emergency absence.
  • He knows Adobe tools and helps students understand design concepts.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Positive reviews imply fair reward for engagement, but .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Courses are introductory design, yet one .

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

At and missed classes hurt recovery.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and patience despite one low rating.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Limited grade data; one student kept a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews emphasize learning software and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Most praise subject expertise, patience, and classroom direction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Graphic design focus points to projects and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and content-rich for most reviewers, with one report of and grade recovery issues.

Main concern

Beginning and absences may be hard to recover from.

What students said

“Fantastic Teacher! Knows subject well & always interested in assisting students understanding of concepts as well as utilizing various Adobe software.”
GRM30
“Very good teacher. Knows his subject well and has lots of patients for anyone with lots of annoying questions.”
GRM31
“his class was one of the though it was a beginning class.”
GRM30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams; assessment appears project and skill based.

Project-focused courseLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize Adobe skills and .

Software projectsConcept understanding
“always interested in assisting students understanding of concepts as well as utilizing various Adobe software.”
GRM30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fantastic Teacher! Knows subject well & always interested in assisting students understanding of concepts as well as utilizing various Adobe software.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting patience, design expertise, and one clarity concern. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Top notch professor!”

🤝 Patience

75/100

“has lots of patients for anyone with lots of annoying questions.”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

40/100

“his class was one of the though it was a beginning class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Knows subject well
  • He can direct the class real well
  • only wish he taught more classes!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • even though he gave me extra work (which I did) my grade never recovered
  • Took both Graphic Design courses with him

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Carlos is a nice teacher
  • Very good teacher
  • always interested in assisting students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with mixed quality and sparse grade or .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GRM302 reviews
GRM311 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values