AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Bhuvana Gopalakrishnan

M11 · CHEMM1AL · CHEMISTRY11 · CHEM11 · CHEMLAB · CHEM60 · CHEM12LAB · CHEMM11 · CHEM12 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can; if you need the chem prereq and can self-study 20+ hours a week.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesHard chemistryOWL homework pathRude when asked questionsAvoid for lecture
  • Many students say real teaching.
  • Course is hard and time-heavy, but , and failed tests.
  • ; several students still say avoid her for lecture.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A demands heavy weekly study; many only salvage a , and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is fast-paced and repeatedly called hell or extremely hard even with practice materials.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

review, and students say you must attend class, workshops, and labs to survive.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

A large share of to another campus.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, and open OWL windows can protect a C, but tests are still much harder than practice for many.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report 20+ study , and workshops.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Positive notes exist on care and lab help, but many call lecture confusing, defensive, accent-hard, or unknowledgeable.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, yet OWL homework, labs, and can dominate whether you pass.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and high-stress, while labs and OWL homework sometimes cushion the .

Main concern

want a different instructor.

What students said

“ . , and rude.”
CHEMM11
“If you do all the even if .”
CHEM11
“ and .”
CHEMLAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often harder than practice materials, so students rely on OWL, labs, and .

Hard testsPractice exams differOWL homeworkLab conclusions

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; OWL and lab work become the safety net.

Harder-than-practice testsOWL homeworkLabs and conclusionsExtra credit points
“ .”
CHEMM11
“ and get a C if you , and conclusions.”
CHEMISTRY11
“she gives you tons of as the real exams.”
CHEM11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't care what you have .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture confusion, heavy study load, and OWL-lab survival. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“Bottom .”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“If you don't have at least 20 hoursto puttoward studying a week you will fail her class, no Joke”

🧪 Grade Safety Net

50/100

“If you do all the even if .”

👎 Recommendation

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and rude
  • just reads off the student guide w/o explination
  • hard to understand and it always seems like she's talking to herself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class is extremely hard
  • I've never worked harder for a C/B-
  • and get a C if you , and conclusions

Theme 3

🧪

  • and
  • She helped me with everything that I missed
  • ok in lab but her lectures are vague

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

24 in-person reviews across 2005-2015 with , and OWL-lab grade paths.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM119 reviews
CHEMM117 reviews
CHEM122 reviews
CHEM12LAB1 review
CHEM601 review
Show 4 more courses
CHEMISTRY111 review
CHEMLAB1 review
CHEMM1AL1 review
M111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values