AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Olympia Lepoint

MATHM03 · MATH115 · MATH05 · MATHM05 · MATH03 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and will show up and do the work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful Math MentorPartial Credit GiverTake-Home TestsSample ExamsHit-or-Miss Organization
  • Many students call her the and praise extra help
  • , and soften the grade path
  • A vocal minority say she is unorganized, late, or reads from the book

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Partial , and take-home exams make solid grades attainable with attendance and effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

, though some still find tests challenging if math is not their strength.

Course-easiness comments are all in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and sometimes rewards staying the full period.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students strongly recommend her help and fairness despite a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Partial credit for trying plus and .

Format shift

Leniency evidence is in-person only.

Workload

Light

68/100

, and participation matter more than crushing volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and sample-test oriented, but some report disorganization and weak Q&A.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of homework, participation, sample tests, and .

Format shift

Assessment mix is from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and grade-friendly for most, with and uneven organization.

Main concern

Organization and consistency vary; a few call teaching robotic or unhelpful.

What students said

“gives a lot of ”
MATH115
“She is the .”
MATH03
“what a terrible teacher. she never brought her book, never answered questions”
MATHM03

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often softened by take-home formats, samples, partial credit, and .

Take-Home TestsSample TestsPartial CreditExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and partial credit for effort.

Take-Home TestsSample TestsPartial CreditExtra Credit
“gives a lot of ”
MATH115
“ and for math work”
MATH03
“she gives you partial credit for trying”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . I was skeptical about taking her, but it was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews on support, exam friendliness, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Supportive Teaching

70/100

“She stays after to help students until they understand.”

📝 Friendly Exams

78/100

“gives a lot of ”

⚠️ Organization Risk

40/100

“Always late to class. Not a good math teacher. She has no lesson plan.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes class fun, shes funny
  • She is a great and clear teacher. .
  • she reads directly from the book like a robot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tons of just for staying and listening to her lectures.
  • just arent good at math.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she cares about you and how well you do
  • She wrote a recommendation for me to go to a 4-year.
  • The people who do not like her are simply brats and immature in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

and thematically consistent, but most predate 2016 and grade reports are rare.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH037 reviews
MATH052 reviews
MATHM032 reviews
MATHM052 reviews
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values