AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Di Passero Kahroline

CALC25A · MATHM31 · INTERALGE · MATH25A · CALC25B · M25A · MATHM05 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and are willing to copy every board note and do the homework.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCrystal Clear Board WorkCaring ExplainerReview Matches TestsOffice Hours GoldNote-Taking Heavy
  • Most students call her one of the best math teachers they have had and .
  • Tests and and review problems with numbers changed.
  • A minority warn she can be strict, unforgiving, or very hard, especially early in the term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

and help a lot, but multiple students still call the course hard or extremely strict.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is real calculus and intermediate algebra difficulty; but content is not soft.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Success depends on copying full lecture notes and staying current, so missing class is costly even if policy is not stated.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students highly recommend her for clarity and care, despite a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some love her fairness and review support, while others call her unforgiving or extremely strict.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

and test-critical, and students warn about constant board-note copying and hand cramps.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and patience until students understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, quizzes, and tests matter; but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person and , and reviews matching exams, with a few sharp warnings about strictness and GPA risk.

Main concern

Heavy note-taking, strict standards, and occasional reports of .

What students said

“ !! Very friendly lady, wants you to exceed and answers questions until you understand!”
M25A
“the day b4 the and uses the exact questions just changes the numbers which is great!”
INTERALGE
“Stay away from this teacher if you value your GPA at all.”
MATHM05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

changed numbers, which is helpful but not open-book.

Review Matches TestHomework-Based QuizzesIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes or tests come from homework.

Review Matches TestHomework-Based Exams
“the day b4 the and uses the exact questions just changes the numbers which is great!”
INTERALGE
“I highly suggest you do the and .”
CALC25A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! Very friendly lady, wants you to exceed and answers questions until you understand!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, difficulty, and personality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

86/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ !”

⚠️ Strict Side

40/100

“this class was way to hard, extremely strict”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really great at explaining things and has such a great sense of humor
  • Copy EVERYTHING she writes on the board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Obviously it's not an easy course, it's math
  • Material is hard, but she is such a caring and amazing teacher
  • Stay away from this teacher if you value your GPA at all

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very friendly lady
  • So nice and funny
  • and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews from 2010-2013 are consistent on teaching quality but thin on grade outcomes and somewhat split on strictness.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CALC25A1 review
CALC25B1 review
INTERALGE1 review
M25A1 review
MATH25A1 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHM051 review
MATHM311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values