AI Rate Professor

Biology

David Peters

BIOLM01 · BIOM01 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

, and hard to fail if you keep up weekly.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBest biology teacherClear expectationsSpot-on study guidesDrops lowest workLectures optional
  • Both reviews call him an outstanding, reasonable biology teacher.
  • and no tricks.
  • and assignments and makes lectures optional but useful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

With droppable labs and poor grades nearly impossible.

All ; no online-counted reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Low difficulty ratings and straight-forward structure make the content approachable for biology intro students.

All ; no online-counted reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

Lectures are explicitly not mandatory, though .

All ; no online-counted reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students call him the and say his class fills quickly for good reason.

All ; no online-counted reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

85/100

and assignments and is described as very reasonable with .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Light

75/100

Weekly work is manageable and if you stay current.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

, and strong student praise for learning outcomes.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Labs, assignments, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person (and one hybrid-described) biology sections are clearly structured with study guides, droppable work, and optional lectures.

Main concern

Very small sample; one review mentions online clarity while tagged in person.

What students said

“The ! Online class was very clearly outlined. You always knew what was expected.”
BIOM01
“He is a great teacher and very reasonable. He drops 3 labs and 3 assignments.”
BIOLM01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel straightforward with strong study guides and no trick questions.

Spot-on study guidesNo tricksStraight forward

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Straight-forward assessments with study guides and no tricks; exact proctoring not described.

Spot-on study guidesNo tricks
“Gave spot on study guides. Very straight forward, no tricks.”
BIOM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The ! Online class was very clearly outlined. You always knew what was expected. Gave spot on study guides. Very straight forward, no tricks.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person-counted reviews with strong agreement. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“The ! Online class was very clearly outlined.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“His class will fill-up quick because he is the best!”

📅

90/100

“The , but ”

⚖️

85/100

“He drops 3 labs and 3 assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You always knew what was expected.
  • Gave spot on study guides.
  • He is a great teacher and very reasonable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very straight forward, no tricks.
  • If you keep up each week, it is impossible to do poorly.
  • He drops 3 labs and 3 assignments.

Theme 3

📅

  • The , but because you will not listen to the archives if you don't.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2012; both positive and detailed, but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIOLM011 review
BIOM011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values