AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Larry Lace

MATH05 · MATHM05A · MATHMO5 · COLLALG · MATH7 · MATHMATH · MATHM03 · MATH7653 · MATHM01 · MATHMO3 · MO3 · MATHM07 · MATH01 · ALGEBM03 · ALGEBM01 · MATH103 · MATHMO7 · MATHM05 · MATH03 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Lace only for a padded math grade if you can teach yourself; if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHuge curveOpen notes oftenExtra credit floodConfusing lecturesSelf-teach required
  • notes/book, and tons of .
  • Teaching quality is polarizing and , and disorganized.
  • if ; risky if you need a solid foundation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and abundant EC make solid grades common if you stick it out.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content and tests can feel hard and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

76/100

and missing class is fine if .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

avoided by those who need real teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

, and open-resource exams in many terms.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

of EC; load is light if .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Large share call lectures confusing, too fast, error-prone, or useless for learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and quizzes dominate; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , while lectures leave many lost and self-teaching.

Main concern

Poor lecture clarity and .

What students said

“he gives you practice reviews for every test which is almost exactly the same to the actual tests ... plus He gives you , and ”
MATHM03
“Absolutely terrible teacher. ... Does not care about students and . RUN RUN RUN!!!”
MATHMO3
“ and final, and his quize's and exams are open book, open notes, calculater, etc.”
MATHM03

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many terms allow notes/book/calculator with , though some later terms tighten rules.

Open notesOpen bookExtra credit triviaHeavy curvePractice tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and trivia EC; a minority report closed notes.

Open notesOpen bookExtra creditCurvesPractice tests
“ .”
MATHM05A
“his quize's and exams are open book, open notes, calculater, etc. : 50% is a C.”
MATHM03
“He Does NOT (and no calculators)”
MATHM05

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want credit for a !!!!!! ... You literally have to TRY to fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, contrasting grade padding with lecture quality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ ! He's all over the place, head in a fog.”

🅰️ Grade Cushion

78/100

“By FAR the easiest class I have evvvver taken. I got over a 100 percent on all tests because of ”

📖

35/100

“I got an A because I taught myself the ENTIRE semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his teaching skills need a lot of help
  • he talks so fast
  • he doesn't teach. he goes very fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A!! . i'm really bad at math and got an A
  • curves test to like 75=A
  • You ... but so much

Theme 3

📝

  • Lets you use the book and
  • open notes and book
  • He Does NOT (and no calculators)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 in-person reviews over many years consistently show soft grading paired with weak teaching clarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 511
3 out of 513
2 out of 511
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATHM059 reviews
MATHM038 reviews
MATH035 reviews
MATHMO54 reviews
MATH053 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATHMO33 reviews
MATH72 reviews
MATH76532 reviews
MATHM012 reviews
MATHM072 reviews
MATHMO72 reviews
ALGEBM011 review
ALGEBM031 review
COLLALG1 review
MATH011 review
MATH1031 review
MATHM05A1 review
MATHMATH1 review
MO31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values