AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ron McCamy

PHILM03 · INTROETHICS · PHILM01 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can handle eccentricity and irregular class meetings.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnowledgeable philosopherCancels class oftenLight workloadEccentric styleUneven organization
  • Strong subject knowledge and
  • Workload is light with and basic tests
  • Frequent cancellations, rambling, and dry lectures split student opinion

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students call the class quite easy with light work and basic tests if you pay attention.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Intro philosophy with light work is manageable, though some find vagueness and tougher moments.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Frequent cancellations imply loose structure, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and easy workload despite style quirks.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and easy-if-you-pay-attention comments point to soft grading overall.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Almost no work, no book in one section, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Knows philosophy deeply and , but can be vague, dry, or unorganized.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and discussion with limited busywork.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and light work, while critics cite vague lectures, cancellations, dry delivery, and tough moments.

Main concern

Frequent cancellations and off-topic or dry lectures reduce structure.

What students said

“Will cancel class often, but great once he actually shows up.”
PHILM01
“Basic tests and light work load make the class very confortable.”
PHILM01
“Goes off topic and rambles sometimes, and doesn't .”
PHILM03

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as basic, though coverage can miss material when lectures ramble.

Basic testsLight homeworkLecture-based review

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and paired with light work, but rambling lectures may skip tested content.

Basic testsLight homeworkCoverage gaps
“Basic tests and light work load make the class very confortable.”
PHILM01
“doesn't .”
PHILM03

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Will cancel class often, but great once he actually shows up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews covering knowledge, light work, and irregular class habits. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Excellent teacher in nearly every way. Always willing to work with ”

🪶 Workload Lightness

82/100

“there is almost no work and no book.”

📅 Class Reliability

40/100

“Will cancel class often, but great once he actually shows up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really knows his stuff and
  • Goes off topic and rambles sometimes
  • Lectures were boring and dry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Basic tests and light work load make the class very confortable.
  • Quite easy, just pay attention.
  • Does not offer a lot of hw

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • A littl eccentric, but nice and helpful.
  • McCamy may rub some ppl the wrong way.
  • This teacher is a very uptight person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2005-2012 are reasonably detailed and mixed but lack grades and recent volume.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILM013 reviews
INTROETHICS1 review
PHILM031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values