AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Matthew Morris

MEDIAM10 · WEBDES · FINEARTS · WEBDESIGN · MMM20 · MULTIMEDIA · MULTMM50 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Solid choice for practical web/multimedia skills if you can handle an occasional abrasive or quirky style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardIndustry ExpertThoroughEntertainingMixed PersonalityProject Time In Class
  • Most students praise real-world web and multimedia knowledge.
  • Courses lean light with in-class project time and .
  • A minority call him arrogant or unprofessional with profanity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Low difficulty ratings and normal effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Most ratings show low difficulty, though one project-heavy class felt harder.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Majority praise knowledge and teaching, with a smaller group turned off by arrogance or tone.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

; projects and class time appear to support solid outcomes.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students get project time in class and report generally low difficulty.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Thorough, entertaining, industry-savvy teaching offset by arrogance and rare unprofessional remarks.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments emphasize projects and class work more than formal exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Hands-on in-person multimedia and web classes led by a knowledgeable, often entertaining industry practitioner.

Main concern

Personality clashes and occasional unprofessional language.

What students said

“He is very knowledgable and helpful. Interesting projects and he gives you time to work on them in class.”
MULTMM50
“Very thorough in descriptions, and has an encyclopedic like knowledge of everything computers.”
WEBDES
“Unprofessional and excessive use of profanity.”
MEDIAM10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects more than formal exams, so .

Project Based

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam rules.

Project Based
“Interesting projects and he gives you time to work on them in class.”
MULTMM50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very thorough in descriptions, and has an encyclopedic like knowledge of everything computers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 , and personality friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧠 Subject Mastery

85/100

“Very thorough in descriptions, and has an encyclopedic like knowledge of everything computers.”

🛠️ Project Support

80/100

“Interesting projects and he gives you time to work on them in class.”

⚠️ Personality Risk

40/100

“Unprofessional and excessive use of profanity.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent teacher.
  • .
  • Very thorough in descriptions

Theme 2

💼 About Real-World Fit

  • class.
  • he did start up what has grown to be his own very successful web design business

Theme 3

😒 About Personality

  • Matthew is soo arrogant
  • Unprofessional and excessive use of profanity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews spanning 2004-2012 give decent volume, but many are short or empty and none include grades.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MULTIMEDIA3 reviews
FINEARTS1 review
MEDIAM101 review
MMM201 review
MULTMM501 review
Show 2 more courses
WEBDES1 review
WEBDESIGN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values