AI Rate Professor

Education

Gwen Alley

ENG2 · ED2AND3 · ENG102 · EDUMO1 · ENG1B · EDU02 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly self-directed and can tolerate disorganization for an .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnprepared lecturesConfusing jumpsEasy grader if you writeHeavy writing
  • Most students call her disorganized, unprepared, and .
  • A minority appreciate challenge, passion, and creativity if you engage independently.
  • Workload can include lots of and weak structure.
  • ],
  • suitableStudentType
  • Self Taught Pro
  • overallSuggestion
  • Avoid unless you are highly self-directed and can tolerate disorganization for an .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

She is often called an if you complete the work, but you still earn the grade through writing effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content challenge is moderate, but poor organization and heavy writing make the experience harder than the material alone.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students say they learned little, found her unprepared, and if optional.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Multiple students say she grades easy if you do the work, even with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of writing, essays, blogs, and homework; lazy students .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Common themes are unprepared classes, , and boredom.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays, writing, blogs, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English and and unclear, with heavy writing and limited structure.

Main concern

Confusion, weak preparation, and .

What students said

“ !!She is not prepared to class. She jump into one subject to another.”
ENG102
“ and activities .”
EDU02
“This granola was so .”
ED2AND3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize writing and essays more than formal exams; .

Essay-heavyLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews focus on essays and writing with .

Essay-heavyLimited exam detail
“A lot of writing and essay but .”
ENG102
“If you are lazy and .”
ENG2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!She is not prepared to class. She jump into one subject to another. ... I leaned NOTHING in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ !!She is not prepared to class.”

📝

72/100

“worst teacher i have ever had, very boring, but .”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“If !”

📚 Workload

35/100

“If you are lazy and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and activities
  • She came to class unprepared and expected the class to run itself
  • She does a lot of non sense talking which is not even part of our main subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She grades easy as long as you do with work with smily faces
  • you earn your grade

Theme 3

⚠️ About Learning Outcomes

  • I leaned NOTHING in this class
  • I absolutely did not learn how to write a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across years are consistently negative on organization, with a few milder positives, but sample is still modest and old.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1022 reviews
ED2AND31 review
EDU021 review
EDUMO11 review
ENG1B1 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values