AI Rate Professor

Film

Stana Milanovich

FTVM26 · FILMM10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

unless you can fully teach yourself and tolerate chronic lateness and zero structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProChronically lateUnorganizedDoesn't teach materialStudents drop classNo clear instructions
  • Students describe her as frazzled, late, and .
  • peers teach each other while she fails to give instructions or grade meaningfully.
  • Passion for film is noted once, but it does not offset the chaotic classroom experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and never returned, so grades feel arbitrary rather than an easy A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content itself is not described as intellectually brutal; the pain comes from poor structure, not hard concepts.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though chronic professor lateness is a recurring complaint.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Multiple students and report learning nothing from her teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and never graded, which is inconsistent rather than generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

A large project with almost no lead time and formal tasks.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she does not know the material, gives no instructions, and they learn from peers instead.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments focus on assigned homework and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person film and news production classes felt chaotic: chronic lateness, weak instruction, and many students leaving early.

Main concern

You may learn only from classmates while she shows up late and .

What students said

“Do not get this professor!!”
FTVM26
“There were 6 of us left in the class by the first month of the semester.”
FTVM26
“She seemed very frazzled and unorganized ... and was late quite often.”
FILMM10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not get this professor!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting chaos, weak teaching, and dropouts. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Terrible teacher. Doesn't know the material at all.”

📉 Class Retention

15/100

“There were only 6 students left in the class and we basically taught ourselves.”

⏰ Reliability

20/100

“Always showed up 15 minutes late.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't know the material at all.
  • Did not learn anything from her, but from the other students.
  • Doesn't give instructions.

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty & Grades

  • only grades on "done or but never graded
  • expects you to finish a

Theme 3

⏰ About Organization

  • She seemed very frazzled and unorganized
  • Always showed up 15 minutes late.
  • was late quite often.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed in-person reviews from 2012, all consistently negative on organization and teaching, but the sample is small and old.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FTVM262 reviews
FILMM101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values