AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Brandon Hilst

MATHM02 · MATH116A · M05 · MATH05 · COLLEGEALGEBRA · MATH5 · MO2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will do the homework and seek help; if you need a slow, hand-holding math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when you askFast-paced lecturesPartial-credit testsCalculators allowedPolarizing math style
  • Many students say and will help if you ask.
  • Math moves fast; homework and .
  • and calculator use softens the blow.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is reachable with , and , but it is not free and several students found the material hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

College algebra and related math feel tough and often move quickly, especially for students who dislike math.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but students say showing up and studying notes is important to keep up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Strong praise from students he clicks with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, and chances to raise scores make grades more recoverable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework and test prep matter; the load is real but not described as crushing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

and personal help win praise, while speed and limited support frustrate others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Success centers on tests plus homework practice rather than heavy projects.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

board work and help, plus complaints about speed and limited support for struggling students.

Main concern

Fast pace and uneven helpfulness can leave weaker math students behind.

What students said

“A wonderful teacher. I hate math but he really helped me understand better than any teacher I have had before.”
MATH116A
“ . , and moved at a very fast pace.”
MATH05
“ so there is a lot of partial credit.”
MATHM02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and partial credit, so they are demanding but somewhat student-friendly.

Written testsPartial creditCalculators allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and calculator use, so careful .

Written testsPartial creditCalculators allowed
“ . so there is a lot of partial credit.”
MATHM02

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A wonderful teacher. I hate math but he really helped me understand better than any teacher I have had before.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2012, highlighting help versus pace. Credibility rating: Medium.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

66/100

“presents everyting on the board and explians everthing touroughly!”

⚡ Pace & Difficulty

48/100

“ , and moved at a very fast pace.”

📝

68/100

“Gave many so you could pass the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very nice. Will help you whenever you need it.
  • Good teacher, straightforward- is readily avalible to help.
  • has a sence of humor too.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the homework, and study for tests and you will be fine.
  • you definitly have to work at it
  • Just make sure you attend each lecture and study the notes.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but very old in-person reviews (2006-2012) with mixed tones give a usable picture but limited current confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COLLEGEALGEBRA1 review
M051 review
MATH051 review
MATH116A1 review
MATH51 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHM021 review
MO21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values