AI Rate Professor

Geology

Ann McCartney

GEOLM02 · GEOL1 · GEOLM · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless and accept a tough, poorly supported course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teach RequiredFast PowerPointsHeavy HomeworkUnclear ExplanationsAvoid If Possible
  • Several students say you must teach yourself because and help is weak.
  • Course is hard with lots of homework and little study guidance or sample tests.
  • One student claims nearly the whole class failed; overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and reports of widespread failure make an A very hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students rate the course hard and say content .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Multiple students and class outcomes.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Reports of mass failure and and assessment feel harsh.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students note lots of .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Common complaints include rushed PowerPoints, weak mastery of material, and little help.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

42/100

; tests exist but support materials are lacking.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person geology described as , and poorly taught, with and little guidance.

Main concern

, and reports of mass failure.

What students said

“This is the the material to yourself.”
GEOLM02
“Horrible teacher!!! !!! ... she failed the whole class except for the only Geology major.”
GEOL1
“Assigns a lot of homework. Does not provide study guides or sample tests.”
GEOLM02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests appear strict and unsupported; reviews mention misspellings and no study guides or samples.

No Study GuidesNo Sample TestsIn-Person TestsSpelling Errors On Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests; at least one student found misspellings on a test.

No Study GuidesNo Sample TestsMisspellings On Tests
“I found misspelling in my test”
GEOLM02
“Does not provide study guides or sample tests.”
GEOLM02

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible teacher!!! !!! Save yourself money and DO NOT!!!! take this course!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching gaps and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

26/100

“She doesnt understand the material. She cant spell she even said it herself.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“Horrible teacher!!! !!!”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Assigns a lot of homework. Does not provide study guides or sample tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you have to teach the material to yourself
  • She goes through her powerpoint at an accelerated speed
  • Hard bt provides help if you ask

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she failed the whole class except for the only Geology major
  • Assigns a lot of homework
  • Does not provide study guides or sample tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 mixed-to-negative older reviews limit confidence despite strong negative consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GEOLM022 reviews
GEOL11 review
GEOLM1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values