AI Rate Professor

English

Derreatha Juarez

ENGLI7049 · ENGM01 · ENGMO1A · ENG01 · ENGM02 · ENGM01A · M01CM01B · ENGMO1B · ENGMO1 · ENGM01B · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want to actually improve as a writer and are willing to do the reading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate about literatureDiscussion-heavyHelps you improve writingClear and caringCollege-prep rigor
  • Students praise her passion, discussion style, and real improvement in writing and critical thinking.
  • As are limited, but a B is attainable with effort.
  • She is repeatedly called one of the learn.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

She is not a and awards few As, but consistent essay work and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Reading and and critical thinking, though many still call the class manageable and enjoyable.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance policy is not spelled out, but and participating.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Nearly every , and real writing growth.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Helpful and not brutal, but several note she grades carefully and is not free with As.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Substantial reading and essays; workload can feel hectic if you fall behind, with little .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students describe clear help, passion for literature, strong discussions, and major writing improvement.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Success hinges on essays, reading, and class discussion more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and skill-building, with moderate-to-solid workload and high praise for teaching quality.

Main concern

A is not free; essays and reading load matter, and .

What students said

“LOVE her. need to do the reading; it's a lot but enjoyable. not the .”
ENGMO1B
“she made my writing improve GREATLY. the work load was little hecktic but as long as you don't fall behind you're golden.”
ENGMO1A
“Excellent teacher! if you really want to learn and be prepared for a 4 year college.”
ENGMO1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and discussion more than high-stakes proctored exams; .

Essay-focusedDiscussion-basedLimited extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, grades rest mainly on essays and participation; .

EssaysClass discussionReading-heavy
“no , so !”
ENGMO1B
“She isn't that hard of a grader and there isn't too much work.”
ENGM01B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is probobly one of the . she made my writing improve GREATLY.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person , and fair rigor. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Excellent teacher! if you really want to learn and be prepared for a 4 year college.”

💬 Discussion Energy

90/100

“SHE LOVES GROUP DISSCUSSIONS. which makes the class fun.”

⚖️ Fair But Not Free As

55/100

“not the . not too hard to get a B though.”

❤️ Supportive Mentor

92/100

“ . and clear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so passionate & open-minded about literature, it's awesome
  • Made subjects really interesting
  • She will teach you to think critically and write at a college level

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • need to do the reading; it's a lot but enjoyable
  • grades a bit hard and are stringent
  • as long as you don't fall behind you're golden

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • always willing
  • does not put anyone down for what they say or the work they do
  • LOVE THIS TEACHER!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve consistently glowing in-person reviews from 2004-2011 give a , though sample size is moderate and older.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGMO1A2 reviews
ENGMO1B2 reviews
ENG011 review
ENGLI70491 review
ENGM011 review
Show 5 more courses
ENGM01A1 review
ENGM01B1 review
ENGM021 review
ENGMO11 review
M01CM01B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values