AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andranik Pogosyan

MATHM03 · MATH105 · MATH05 · MATHMO7 · MATHM01 · MATHM05 · MATH5 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can pre-study chapters and use tutoring; many strong students still struggled.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast-paced lecturesThick accentExtra credit for homeworkPolarizing teachingTests harder than homework
  • Reviews and students who felt lost.
  • Pace is often too fast; accent and .
  • and if you stay caught up and use tutoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

helps, but and fast pace mean an A usually requires heavy outside effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material moves quickly with technical problems and limited in-class help for struggling students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; missing class can mean missing a whole chapter.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Some students thrive with his help and ; many others strongly advise finding another instructor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Homework often counts as exam and makeups are possible, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly quizzes, monthly tests, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Kind and patient for some; hard to understand, too fast, and unhelpful for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly quizzes and ; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise clear explanations and , others report hellish pace, accent barriers, and .

Main concern

Very fast pace and .

What students said

“Prepare for hell! ... .”
MATHM03
“He made it very easy to understand and was very good at explaining things in simple terms.”
MATHM03
“he moves VERY quickly and doesn't help if you have questions. Went home crying weekly.”
MATH05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent quizzes and hard monthly tests; as .

Weekly quizzesMonthly testsHomework as extra creditHard test problems

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly quizzes plus monthly tests that some ; as EC.

Weekly quizzesMonthly testsHomework as ECDifficult test problems
“There is a as well as a .”
MATHM03
“ problems possible. .”
MATH5
“ . do workshop problems before every test, .”
MATHMO7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prepare for hell! I hold a very strong GPA... Be wise and find another instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, highlighting pace, accent, , and split outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚡ Pace & Clarity

40/100

“he goes Pretty fast, but overall he cares about students succeeding and makes it so a student easily can.”

🎁 Help

60/100

“ and gives many opportunities!”

🔀 Polarized Experience

48/100

“I have never done well in a math class until I had this professor. He made it very easy to understand”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Thick accent but . Would stay after class if needed.
  • He doesn't teach all the material that he assigns for homework
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as .
  • problems possible.

Theme 3

⚠️ Warning Signs

  • We started out w/ 40 people in our class and when I dropped there were only 7 people left.
  • Went home crying weekly.
  • im never going to take him or another Saturday class again.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen mixed in-person reviews with detailed praise and complaints; older (2005-2011) but consistent themes on pace and .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATHM034 reviews
MATHM054 reviews
MATH52 reviews
MATH051 review
MATH1051 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHM011 review
MATHMO71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values