AI Rate Professor

Biology

Aruni De Silva

MICRM01 · MICROM01 · BAC101 · MICRO01 · MICROMICR · MICRO101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; students warn of , and serious GPA damage.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWorst ProfessorRude & UnhelpfulUnorganized LecturesUnfair ExamsGPA Risk
  • Overwhelming majority call her the
  • Lectures described as , and poorly prepared
  • Harsh grading with failed half the class and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Reports of half the class failing, few Bs, and A unrealistic.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Material is treated as extremely hard because and she allegedly lacks command of content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Nearly every review and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students report mass failures, few high grades, and blame shifted onto the class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

High difficulty and high-stakes unfair exams create an overwhelming .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Dominated by claims of rudeness, unprepared lectures, contradictions, and refusal to help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments and catastrophic test outcomes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Nearly uniform in-person warnings of rude, unprepared teaching and ; two older positive outliers exist.

Main concern

, and belittling classroom climate.

What students said

“After completely my undergrad and grad school, I can honestly say that Aruni is the .”
MICRO01
“ and filled with mistakes. She belittles ppl& will make you feel dumb!”
MICROM01
“ the 70's.”
BAC101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as unfair, error-filled, and devastating to grades.

Unfair ExamsExam MistakesLow Class Max ScoresHarsh Curve

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, with class highs only in the 70s and many failures.

Unfair ExamsExam MistakesHighest Grade in 70sMass Failures
“ the 70's.”
BAC101
“ and filled with mistakes.”
MICROM01
“She failed half my class and there were only a few B's.”
MICRO01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“After completely my undergrad and grad school, I can honestly say that Aruni is the . She was rude to students and constantly contradicted herself when teaching. She failed half my class and there were only a few B's. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“ ... . SHE DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO TEACH!”

🚫 Recommendation

10/100

“i would .”

📉

10/100

“She failed half my class and there were only a few B's.”

🧪

22/100

“ the 70's.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • came to class unprepared
  • constantly contradicted herself when teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She failed half my class
  • highest grade was only in the 70's
  • and filled with mistakes

Theme 3

😡 About Classroom Climate

  • rude to students
  • belittles ppl& will make you feel dumb
  • Blames everything on the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews with strong thematic consistency over 2009-2011 and rich negative detail outweigh two older positive notes.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MICRO1014 reviews
MICRO013 reviews
MICROM013 reviews
MICROMICR3 reviews
BAC1012 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MICRM011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values